Re: Initial set of proposed release criteria for Server product

2014-06-17 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:01 -0400, Russell Doty wrote: > > This particular thread is about release criteria, not validation tests, > > note. It's not comprehensive - note the bit of the post that read > > "*excluding* Role functionality - I expect we'll need a whole subset of > > criteria for Role

Re: Initial set of proposed release criteria for Server product

2014-06-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 12:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Per-role functional requirements are certainly something we could add, > and probably a good idea, but they'd have to be done as part of actually > creating the roles. We don't have a DNS server role yet, and it's not in > the set of two

Re: Initial set of proposed release criteria for Server product

2014-06-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 11:51 -0400, Russell Doty wrote: > What about adding a functional test or smoke test as part of > installation - have an automated test that validates that the server > role is functioning correctly. For example, for a dns server verify that > it can properly resolve addresses

Re: Initial set of proposed release criteria for Server product

2014-06-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 18:47:46 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: I would add: A strong spam filtering system, easy to set up with reasonable documentation. I think that is role specific and I didn't think a mail server role was going to be one of the initial roles. -- test mailing list

Re: Initial set of proposed release criteria for Server product

2014-06-06 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/07/14 10:00, David wrote: > On 6/6/2014 9:47 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: >> I would add: A strong spam filtering system, >> easy to set up with reasonable documentation. >> > > I am sure that they would appreciate and evaluate the code when you > provide it Chuck. I know that I would. >

Re: Initial set of proposed release criteria for Server product

2014-06-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 18:47 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > I would add: A strong spam filtering system, > easy to set up with reasonable documentation. This isn't really a suggestion box for Server product features: we already have that, in the tech specs - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Se

Re: Initial set of proposed release criteria for Server product

2014-06-06 Thread David
On 6/6/2014 9:47 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > I would add: A strong spam filtering system, > easy to set up with reasonable documentation. > I am sure that they would appreciate and evaluate the code when you provide it Chuck. I know that I would. -- David -- test mailing list test@l

Re: Initial set of proposed release criteria for Server product

2014-06-06 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
I would add: A strong spam filtering system, easy to set up with reasonable documentation. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pa

Initial set of proposed release criteria for Server product

2014-06-06 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks. Here's my initial dump of proposed release criteria specific to Server. This is primarily a Server WG responsibility (per the draft test plan - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Fedora_21_test_plan - and the discussion of same), but CCing test@ as I know some folks there