Re: No "19" yet in Bugzilla version field

2013-02-08 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > The automated bug reporter in anaconda 19 won't let me specify rawhide and > won't file the bug since 19 isn't in the version field. > Sounds like a bug in the bug reporter :-) Please file it Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedo

Re: No "19" yet in Bugzilla version field

2013-02-08 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 02/07/2013 10:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Right. Reports go against Rawhide till branching. Appropriate ones will be magically transferred to 19 at branch time, I believe. The automated bug reporter in anaconda 19 won't let me specify rawhide and won't file the bug since 19 isn't in the

Re: No "19" yet in Bugzilla version field

2013-02-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On 07/02/13 10:03 PM, John Reiser wrote: Is there magic for bugs against 18 that are also bugs in 19 once branch happens? I have participated in several bugzilla reports of this kind (bug in Fedora N remains unfixed as Fedora N+1 appears with "new" package) but I have not seen any "magic". The

Re: No "19" yet in Bugzilla version field

2013-02-07 Thread John Reiser
> Is there magic for bugs against 18 that are also bugs in 19 once branch > happens? I have participated in several bugzilla reports of this kind (bug in Fedora N remains unfixed as Fedora N+1 appears with "new" package) but I have not seen any "magic". The original reporter, or some person with

Re: No "19" yet in Bugzilla version field

2013-02-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 7, 2013, at 8:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Right. Reports go against Rawhide till branching. Appropriate ones will be > magically transferred to 19 at branch time, I believe. Is there magic for bugs against 18 that are also bugs in 19 once branch happens? Chris Murphy -- test mai

Re: No "19" yet in Bugzilla version field

2013-02-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On 07/02/13 06:26 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 20:47:34 -0500, "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote: --- Comment #2 from Simon Green --- The Fedora team manage their Bugzilla product attributes directly. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908988 OK, Fedora team, punted

Re: No "19" yet in Bugzilla version field

2013-02-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 20:47:34 -0500, "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote: --- Comment #2 from Simon Green --- The Fedora team manage their Bugzilla product attributes directly. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908988 OK, Fedora team, punted over to you.:-) 19 hasn't branched yet. You p

Re: No "19" yet in Bugzilla version field

2013-02-07 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 02/07/2013 08:47 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: --- Comment #2 from Simon Green --- The Fedora team manage their Bugzilla product attributes directly. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908988 OK, Fedora team, punted over to you.:-) I see closed as notabug since 19 only becomes ac

No "19" yet in Bugzilla version field

2013-02-07 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
--- Comment #2 from Simon Green --- The Fedora team manage their Bugzilla product attributes directly. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908988 OK, Fedora team, punted over to you.:-) -- Regards, OldFart -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin