Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread TK009
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > I'm not sure it's wise to increase privileges immediately after the welcome > letter (was it > meant this way?). The bugzappers have been doing it that way since I joined. It was explained to me when I joined that anything done incorrectly

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread TK009
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Here's another thing that's been on my todo list for a while. > > So we still get proventester and bugzapper membership requests > regularly, and poor old dr johnson and to a small degree myself > laboriously go around telling pe

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 01/25/2013 03:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 08:34 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: So it'd be nice to kill those processes a bit harder: I don't have all the specific changes drafted up yet, but my idea would be to actually hide the text on the proventesters and BZ

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 08:34 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > So it'd be nice to kill those processes a bit harder: I don't have all > > the specific changes drafted up yet, but my idea would be to actually > > hide the text on the proventesters and BZ pages that describes the > > 'joining

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread Kamil Paral
> So it'd be nice to kill those processes a bit harder: I don't have > all > the specific changes drafted up yet, but my idea would be to actually > hide the text on the proventesters and BZ pages that describes the > 'joining' processes. When we first hibernated the PT process we kinda > thought i

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding

2013-01-25 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 01/25/2013 01:24 PM, Bob Lightfoot wrote: Hash: SHA1 So Adam let me see if I get it straight. During my hiatus from testing {known as the F17 acceptance cycle} you mothballed the ProvenTesters and BugZappers programs, but left some stray references to them laying around the wikisphere. Ada

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding

2013-01-25 Thread Bob Lightfoot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So Adam let me see if I get it straight. During my hiatus from testing {known as the F17 acceptance cycle} you mothballed the ProvenTesters and BugZappers programs, but left some stray references to them laying around the wikisphere. You want to furt

Re: Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-25 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 01/25/2013 06:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey folks! Here's another thing that's been on my todo list for a while. So we still get proventester and bugzapper membership requests regularly, and poor old dr johnson and to a small degree myself laboriously go around telling people 'hi, thanks

Proposal: retire proventesters and bugzappers onboarding processes harder, create new QA onboarding process

2013-01-24 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey folks! Here's another thing that's been on my todo list for a while. So we still get proventester and bugzapper membership requests regularly, and poor old dr johnson and to a small degree myself laboriously go around telling people 'hi, thanks for joining, but that cake was a lie! please come