Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 13:02 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > I didn't really mean to preclude the use of a minimal package set, I'm > > just trying to exclude the problems we've been having whereby the test > > cases and criteria are kind of getting 'gamed' with odd choices =) I'll > > see if I can fi

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-20 Thread Kamil Paral
> I didn't really mean to preclude the use of a minimal package set, I'm > just trying to exclude the problems we've been having whereby the test > cases and criteria are kind of getting 'gamed' with odd choices =) I'll > see if I can find a happy medium... I think a general sentence like this cou

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 08:43 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > I wrote > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_anaconda_lvmthinp_rootfs , > > > and I propose we add it to the installation validation matrix for F21 > > > > I am concerned by this sentence: > > "Proceed with installation, leavi

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-19 Thread Kamil Paral
> > I wrote > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_anaconda_lvmthinp_rootfs , > > and I propose we add it to the installation validation matrix for F21 > > I am concerned by this sentence: > "Proceed with installation, leaving all other settings at default where > possible, using sensible

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-19 Thread Kamil Paral
> I wrote > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_anaconda_lvmthinp_rootfs , > and I propose we add it to the installation validation matrix for F21 I am concerned by this sentence: "Proceed with installation, leaving all other settings at default where possible, using sensible values for an

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-17 Thread Chris Murphy
On Dec 17, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 00:57 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Dec 16, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >>> Actually - it'd basically just be the 'guided installation' table from >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Dra

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-17 Thread Chris Murphy
On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:57 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Dec 16, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Actually - it'd basically just be the 'guided installation' table from >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_storage_matrix#Guided_installationwithout >> all the oth

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-17 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 00:57 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Dec 16, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Actually - it'd basically just be the 'guided installation' table from > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_storage_matrix#Guided_installationwithout > > all the o

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-16 Thread Chris Murphy
On Dec 16, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Actually - it'd basically just be the 'guided installation' table from > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_storage_matrix#Guided_installationwithout > all the other bits, basically. I basically get this. I expect there'll b

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 14:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > I meant to write this test case anyhow, but today's brown paper bag bug > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1040669 - gives > it a certain sense of importance, so I thought I'd best get it done now. > > I wrote > http

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-16 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 12/14/2013 01:49 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:49 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Dec 13, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >>> I meant to write this test case anyhow, but today's brown paper bag bug >>> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 00:49 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Dec 13, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:49 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> > >> Yeah I'm holding off on a major f bomb email until I understand what > >> happened and exactly when this broke. If y

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-13 Thread Chris Murphy
On Dec 13, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:49 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> Yeah I'm holding off on a major f bomb email until I understand what >> happened and exactly when this broke. If you have some insight on that >> to save me regression testing, tha

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:49 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Dec 13, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I meant to write this test case anyhow, but today's brown paper bag bug > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1040669 - gives > > it a certain sense of importanc

Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-13 Thread Chris Murphy
On Dec 13, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I meant to write this test case anyhow, but today's brown paper bag bug > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1040669 - gives > it a certain sense of importance, so I thought I'd best get it done now. > > I wrote > https:/

Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

2013-12-13 Thread Adam Williamson
I meant to write this test case anyhow, but today's brown paper bag bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1040669 - gives it a certain sense of importance, so I thought I'd best get it done now. I wrote https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_anaconda_lvmthinp_rootfs , and