All: My only comment is that it seems that #2 would certainly lengthen meeting
times. I myself don't object to this as I do not currently have a job, but one
of these days that may impede my ability to make said meetings.
> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:47:21 -0500
> Subject: ProvenTesters Sponsors
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:47 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> Hello testers!
>
> I wanted to open a conversation on the list about how we want to as a
> group handle sponsorship. I wanted to propose two ideas I had and
> leave the floor open for other suggestions.
>
> 1) Allow the sponsors/mentors to i
I'd say only those interested in being mentors.
Dulaney
> Subject: Re: ProvenTesters Sponsorship
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:16:56 -0700
>
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:47 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> > Hel
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:47 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> Hello testers!
>>
>> I wanted to open a conversation on the list about how we want to as a
>> group handle sponsorship. I wanted to propose two ideas I had and
>> leave the floor open
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 08:10 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:47 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> >> Hello testers!
> >>
> >> I wanted to open a conversation on the list about how we want to as a
> >> group handle sponsorship
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:25 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > Sounds good to me and seems like others share the opinion, I will
> > update the wiki today to reflect the change as well as add the step
> > for applying to FAS in the table as fenris02 pointed out to me that it
> > appears to be missing.
