Zx
X
Xx
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015, 6:39 PM Russel Winder wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 12:56 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > […]
> >
> > As a general rule of thumb anything proprietary binary only will be
> > painful in rawhide. Anything can change through out the dev cycle and
> > you have t
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 12:56 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > […]
>
> As a general rule of thumb anything proprietary binary only will be
> painful in rawhide. Anything can change through out the dev cycle and
> you have to wait for the vendor to catch up. Recently Xorg was bumped
> to the late
>> > Since kernel 4.1.0, I have not been able to get an NVIDIA
>> > driver/support to compile and work on Rawhide. Either the download
>> > would not compile at all, or now it compiles but fails to work
>> > correctly. As far as I can tell (I may well be wrong) the beta
>> > 358.09
>> > is the only
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 08:02 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Russel Winder
> wrote:
>
> > Since kernel 4.1.0, I have not been able to get an NVIDIA
> > driver/support to compile and work on Rawhide. Either the download
> > would not compile at all, or now it compiles
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
> Since kernel 4.1.0, I have not been able to get an NVIDIA
> driver/support to compile and work on Rawhide. Either the download
> would not compile at all, or now it compiles but fails to work
> correctly. As far as I can tell (I may well be
Since kernel 4.1.0, I have not been able to get an NVIDIA
driver/support to compile and work on Rawhide. Either the download
would not compile at all, or now it compiles but fails to work
correctly. As far as I can tell (I may well be wrong) the beta 358.09
is the only driver/support that compiles
