Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

On Thu, 2025-01-16 at 12:51 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 8:41 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > Hi folks! I decided it's finally time to knock this action item off my > > todo list... > > > > Last cycle, we had a proposed blocker[1] which relied on a footnote to > > the Bet

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 8:41 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! I decided it's finally time to knock this action item off my > todo list... > > Last cycle, we had a proposed blocker[1] which relied on a footnote to > the Beta upgrade criterion which was added way back when we first set > up the

Re: rtl8812au rtl88x2bu drivers

Hey, Saw a note the the rtl8812au rtl88x2bu drivers were being builtin into > the kernel for f42. They are not in the 6.13.0* kernels and the github > packages that worked for the 6.12.0* kernels now fail > There's 8812AU and 8821AU drivers, I don't see any of the b variants referenced, but I'v

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

What about packages that used to be dependencies but are no longer so? The "unused dependencies" packages. (Sorry if this email is misformated, I am not subscribed to this list, so I use the web interface.) -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedor

Re: is /proc/net/wireless really gone?

Hi Peter, On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 12:03:28 + Peter Robinson wrote: > Yes, it has really gone, it's been deprecated since 2006. > > I filed a bug report against bumblebee-status > > (https://github.com/tobi-wan-kenobi/bumblebee-status/issues/1029). > > > > Bumblebee should move to using the ne

Re: Criteria proposal: reword beta upgrade package requirement footnote

Looks good to me. Have a Great Day! Pat (tablepc) On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 2:41 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! I decided it's finally time to knock this action item off my > todo list... > > Last cycle, we had a proposed blocker[1] which relied on a footnote to > the Beta upgrade criter

Re: is /proc/net/wireless really gone?

Hi, On Sat, 4 Jan 2025, 04:30 Onyeibo Oku, wrote: > Happy New Year everyone, > > I am getting an error message on my status bar (which depends on > a manager called bumblebee-status). The message reads: > > [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/proc/net/wireless' > > This has been the case for

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

On Fri, 2024-12-27 at 17:32 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > I just installed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.17-11.fc41 to see if it > makes any > difference, forcing its use via /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/. It made no > difference > apparent to me, so I removed the config and the nouveau DDX rpm, > which normally

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

Sérgio Basto composed on 2024-12-27 17:49 (UTC): > On Sun, 2024-12-15 at 18:15 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: >> Felix Miata composed on 2024-12-13 16:25 (UTC-0500): >>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385 >>> GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled >>> No local I/O i

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

On Sun, 2024-12-15 at 18:15 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > Felix Miata composed on 2024-12-13 16:25 (UTC-0500): > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385 > > GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled > > No local I/O is possible once KMS engages. > > > 6.11.11-300.fc41

Re: Update has been bouncing of Bohdi for months

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 2:24 AM Ian Laurie via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Someone who understands the mechanisms needs to take a look at: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4e960d96d5 > > It's been submitted to stable about 3 million times but keeps bouncing

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

Felix Miata composed on 2024-12-13 16:25 (UTC-0500): > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385 > GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled > No local I/O is possible once KMS engages. > 6.11.11-300.fc41.x86_64 produces the same problem as all other post-6.6 > kernels.

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

> schrieb Felix Miata: >> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385 >> GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled >> No local I/O is possible once KMS engages. > did you check the 6.13 series from Rawhide yet? Do you have some special knowledge of change there that should

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

Sérgio Basto composed on 2024-12-13 19:25 (UTC-0500): > On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 16:25 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: >> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385 >> GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled >> No local I/O is possible once KMS engages. >> 6.11.11-300.fc41.x86_6

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:25 PM Felix Miata wrote: > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385 > GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled > No local I/O is possible once KMS engages. > > 6.11.11-300.fc41.x86_64 produces the same problem as all other post-6.6 > kernels.

Re: GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler regression: black screen when KMS enabled

On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 16:25 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385 > GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled > No local I/O is possible once KMS engages. > > 6.11.11-300.fc41.x86_64 produces the same problem as all other post- > 6.6 kernels

Re: IPA Migrate test days

On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 at 12:25, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > IDM and Fedora QA team are running a test event for testing IPA to IPA > migrate feature. Good stuff. > The design document sums up the feature well enough[0]. If you are some with > experience > with IPA ; feel free to jump to this tes

Re: Fwd: Linux kernel 6.1.3 released

Yeah i was too fast with Gmail search sorry for that Den sön 8 dec. 2024 kl 17:33 skrev Felix Miata : > > Adam Williamson composed on 2024-12-08 08:02 (UTC-0800): > > > On Fri, 2024-12-06 at 21:57 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> 6.1.2. Are we sure Luna Jernberg is a human able to see and hear and

Re: Fwd: Linux kernel 6.1.3 released

Adam Williamson composed on 2024-12-08 08:02 (UTC-0800): > On Fri, 2024-12-06 at 21:57 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: >> 6.1.2. Are we sure Luna Jernberg is a human able to see and hear and not an >> AI? I >> see wacko posting from Luna in various other lists, notably openSUSE, but >> others >> as w

Re: Fwd: Linux kernel 6.1.3 released

On Fri, 2024-12-06 at 21:57 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > Adam Williamson composed on 2024-12-06 18:20 (UTC-0800): > > > On Fri, 2024-12-06 at 08:46 +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: > > > > This one works better then 6.1.2 with kernel panics > > > so you have more to package so we can test when you are

Re: Fwd: Linux kernel 6.1.3 released

and accidentally answered on the wrong email, i am just pretty burned out Den sön 8 dec. 2024 kl 09:58 skrev Luna Jernberg : > > I am a real human i just did typo the number i did mean 6.12.2 and 6.12.3 > > Den lör 7 dec. 2024 kl 03:57 skrev Felix Miata : > > > > Adam Williamson composed on 2024-1

Re: Fwd: Linux kernel 6.1.3 released

I am a real human i just did typo the number i did mean 6.12.2 and 6.12.3 Den lör 7 dec. 2024 kl 03:57 skrev Felix Miata : > > Adam Williamson composed on 2024-12-06 18:20 (UTC-0800): > > > On Fri, 2024-12-06 at 08:46 +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: > > >> This one works better then 6.1.2 with kernel

Re: Adding tests for Fedora Linux on VMware Workstation/Fusion

i actually have to retract my previous post/answer since today i went on testing latest VMware 17.6.1 on F41 KDE and it seems it has improved alot on now with hands of Broadcom... installer is simple and easy it shows more details on process. the issue comes on VMNET and VMMON sinse those need t

Re: Fwd: Linux kernel 6.1.3 released

Adam Williamson composed on 2024-12-06 18:20 (UTC-0800): > On Fri, 2024-12-06 at 08:46 +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: >> This one works better then 6.1.2 with kernel panics >> so you have more to package so we can test when you are awake :) > Um, as the date on that email says, 6.1.3 came out in Ja

Re: Fwd: Linux kernel 6.1.3 released

On Fri, 2024-12-06 at 08:46 +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: > This one works better then 6.1.2 with kernel panics > so you have more to package so we can test when you are awake :) Um, as the date on that email says, 6.1.3 came out in January 2023. That's "six point one point three". The current kerne

Re: [Test-Announce]Propose to make Fedora WSL Blocking

On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 14:37, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:54 PM Sumantro Mukherjee via test-announce > wrote: > > > > Hello All, > > > > As many of you might know, Fedora WSL is coming to Fedora Linux 42[0]. > > This will be a good starting point for many people and > > b

Re: [Test-Announce]Propose to make Fedora WSL Blocking

On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 23:10 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:54 PM Sumantro Mukherjee via test-announce < > test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > As many of you might know, Fedora WSL is coming to Fedora Linux 42[0]. > > This will be a good sta

Re: [Test-Announce]Propose to make Fedora WSL Blocking

On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:54 PM Sumantro Mukherjee via test-announce wrote: > > Hello All, > > As many of you might know, Fedora WSL is coming to Fedora Linux 42[0]. > This will be a good starting point for many people and > blocking this artifact will help us ensure the experience is not broken.

Re: [Test-Announce]Propose to make Fedora WSL Blocking

I think it is good to have wsl for fedora its long overdue. I dont know about automated testing on windows but from being qa volunteer I haven't seen any yet On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, 04:11 Neal Gompa, wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:54 PM Sumantro Mukherjee via test-announce < > test-annou...@list

Re: [Test-Announce]Propose to make Fedora WSL Blocking

On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:54 PM Sumantro Mukherjee via test-announce < test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hello All, > > As many of you might know, Fedora WSL is coming to Fedora Linux 42[0]. > This will be a good starting point for many people and > blocking this artifact will help u

Re: kernel-6.12.1 breaks VirtualBox hosts by default

On Monday, December 2, 2024, Ian Laurie via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 2/12/24 10:37, Scott Dowdle via test wrote: > versa... but it isn't that difficult for a VirtualBox user to hold back > on a kernel update until VirtualBox gets updated. You'll get used to it. > > This is

Re: kernel-6.12.1 breaks VirtualBox hosts by default

On 2/12/24 10:37, Scott Dowdle via test wrote: versa... but it isn't that difficult for a VirtualBox user to hold back on a kernel update until VirtualBox gets updated. You'll get used to it. This is a lot more serious that the *routine* host kernel compatibility problems that happen in new kern

Re: kernel-6.12.1 breaks VirtualBox hosts by default

On Sunday, December 1st, 2024 at 4:28 PM, Ian Laurie via test wrote: > On 30/11/24 18:50, Ian Laurie via test wrote: > Not just me. > > Upstream bug: > > https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/22248 > > Worth reading the kernel thread: > > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/zwqjusole6swa...@google.com/T

Re: kernel-6.12.1 breaks VirtualBox hosts by default

On 30/11/24 18:50, Ian Laurie via test wrote: Is this expected behavior with 6.12 or is it somehow specific to me? Can't we have the module unloaded *by default* and have QEMU/KVM load it as required?  Then unload it when the last VM exits? Seems useless having it loaded all the time, especially

Re: Kernel 6.12 Test Week Invitation

Helping out a bit today, and will help out as much as i can during the week thats coming Den lör 30 nov. 2024 kl 14:12 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee : > Hey All, > > I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.12 > Test week is happening from 2024-12-01 to 2024-12-08. It's > fairl

Re: 2024-10-14 - Fedora Quality Meeting - Minutes

Reply On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:02 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > (editor note: catching up with some old minutes, sorry) > > = > # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: Quality > = > > Meeting started by @adamwill:fedora.im at 2024-10-1

Re: Fedora 39 end of life today (2024-11-26)

On Tue, 2024-11-26 at 08:07 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hello all, > > Fedora Linux fN is going end of life for updates and support on > 2024-11-26 (today!). > No more updates of any kind, including security updates or security > announcements, will be available for Fedora Linux 39 after today

Re: Adding tests for Fedora Linux on VMware Workstation/Fusion

Yes that’s been my experience as well. VMware seemed kinda buggy. Not so much on Mac OS X. With Linux it’s one reason why I’ve reverted to Boxes. It’s been awhile though and I am open to trying whatever we need to do. Derek Enz On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 7:46 PM Marko Jokinen via test < test@lists.

Re: Adding tests for Fedora Linux on VMware Workstation/Fusion

VMware is a mess on Linux especially if you run secure boot enabled since you need to get and sign VMware modules and yhen hope all kernel packages matches that it can build it is no worth for VMware to use on Linux since there is so much easier ways and faster virt-manager and boxes... I have

Re: Adding tests for Fedora Linux on VMware Workstation/Fusion

On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 11:53 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > Hey folks, > > I'd like to ask if we could consider adding regular tests for running > Fedora Linux on VMware Workstation and VMware Fusion. Both products > are now available for use at no-cost for any purpose[1]. Notably, > VMware Fusion is t

Re: Problem rpm in f42

Tried to send the output to a file but I've forgotten how to capture error messages. Most are related to things that rpmfusion typically provides for codecs -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-l

Re: Results for F39 to F41 upgrades tests

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 7:36 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Hello, > as promised, I am sending the results of the upgrade tests from F39 to F41. > > *Test 1: Upgrade from F39 to F41 using Software* > When Software is used to perform the upgrade, the mentioned applications, > Camera and Ptyxis, *do not

Re: SOLUTION: dbus start fails and logins are disabled

Hi, Well... I got lucky. I did 2 things. #1 - add "selinux=0" to the grub boot parameter and "dnf reinstall '*dbus*'. I'm relieved. Best regards, George... On Sunday, November 10, 2024 at 08:40:51 PM PST, George R Goffe wrote: Hi, After a few upgrades over several days, I reboote

Re: Fedora 41 Beta iio-sensor-proxy stopped working after dnf upgrade

I can confirm this as well on a MS Surface Go 2. It looks like it has also been reported in bugzilla. I'll watch these to see if someone submits a fix. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324181 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2319766 Cheers, Patrick On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 a

Re: Problem rpm in f42

On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 8:51 PM Robert McBroom wrote: > The following packages have not been able to update for the last two > weeks. There is no indication what is preventing the updates > > Skipping packages with conflicts: > libavcodec-free x86_64 > 7.0.2-6.fc42

Re: Problem rpm in f42

On 11/1/24 5:25 PM, John Mellor wrote: On 2024-11-01 3:51 p.m., Robert McBroom wrote: The following packages have not been able to update for the last two weeks. There is no indication what is preventing the updates Skipping packages with conflicts:  libavcodec-free x86_64 7.

Re: Problem rpm in f42

On 2024-11-01 3:51 p.m., Robert McBroom wrote: The following packages have not been able to update for the last two weeks. There is no indication what is preventing the updates Skipping packages with conflicts:  libavcodec-free x86_64 7.0.2-6.fc42  rawhide  

Re: Podman 5.3 Test Day 2024-11-01 through 2024-11-08

I will do this if someone will guide how to run these on atomic example Kinoite is my main or I just need to make non atomic and test I use daily as podman on my workflows with toolbox and containers so setting up takes some time and my immutable setup is ready So how I can just update podman t

Re: Virtual Machine fails to load in f41

Problem no longer exists -- ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: h

Re: VirtualBox Guest Additions in F41

On 10/26/24 2:21 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 10/26/24 9:22 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: In F41 I  switched from Virtualbox.org (oracle) to the fedora edition of VirtualBox, and I learned that the past "Virtualbox guest addition" functions now have been realized by some fedora pkg called *virtualbox-

Re: VirtualBox Guest Additions in F41

On Sat, 2024-10-26 at 18:22 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: >  In F41 I  switched from Virtualbox.org (oracle) to the fedora > edition  of VirtualBox, and I learned >  that the past "Virtualbox guest addition" functions now have been > realized by some fedora pkg called >  virtualbox-guest-additions,

Re: VirtualBox Guest Additions in F41

On 10/26/24 9:22 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: In F41 I  switched from Virtualbox.org (oracle) to the fedora edition of VirtualBox, and I learned that the past "Virtualbox guest addition" functions now have been realized by some fedora pkg called *virtualbox-guest-additions*, but I have problems to

Re: VirtualBox Guest Additions in F41

Joachim Backes wrote: > In F41 I  switched from Virtualbox.org (oracle) to the fedora edition  > of VirtualBox, and I learned > that the past "Virtualbox guest addition" functions now have been > realized by some fedora pkg called > *virtualbox-guest-additions*, but I have problems to use this pa

Re: Virtual Machine fails to load in f41

On 10/25/24 12:56 PM, Robert McBroom wrote: Have two qemu/kvm virtual machines that were working in f40. Updated system to 41 and I'm getting the error that the iso for the rasberry os and the kali linux can't be accessed due to permissions. They are in / home/rm3/Downloads. The Rawhide virtual

Re: Virtual Machine fails to load in f41

Greetings, On Friday, October 25th, 2024 at 1:56 PM, Robert McBroom wrote: > Have two qemu/kvm virtual machines that were working in f40. Updated > system to 41 and I'm getting the error that the iso for the rasberry os > and the kali linux can't be accessed due to permissions. They are in > /ho

Re: Self-introduction: Niels-s

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 12:57 PM Niels via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm joining the Fedora QA. > Been using Linux for just around a year, but convinced in the meantime > that Fedora's worth the effort to contribute to the community. > > No programming skills,

Re: Raspberry Pi 4B+ testing

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 3:15 PM Brandon Nielsen via test wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just noticed on my Pi 4B+ that display output on the second micro HDMI > port (the one further from the USB-C power supply port) is corrupted. > The first port is fine. > > The corruption is visible as rainbow halos

Re: Help needed: Intel-based Mac dual boot testing

Hi Kamil, Happy to test! I already submitted a success using `relval` with the Fedora 41 Beta 1.3 ISO. Note: this was already discussed in Matrix at Fedora Quality. Best, Osama On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 4:13 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > Hi folks, > if anyone has an Intel-based Mac (Macbook, Mac Mini

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

On 10/23/24 11:54, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 03:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: fedora-release-common-39-36.noarch was not removed (had a duplicate of 41) by the upgrade. This caused dnf to think I was still on 39 and why all the 39 packages remained Duplicate packa

Re: Help needed: Intel-based Mac dual boot testing

On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 20:01 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote: > On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 14:13, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > if anyone has an Intel-based Mac (Macbook, Mac Mini) which could be used > > for dual-boot testing with Fedora 41, that would be very helpful. We don't > > have any such h

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 03:33 -0700, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: > > fedora-release-common-39-36.noarch was not removed (had a > duplicate of 41) by the upgrade. This caused dnf to > think I was still on 39 and why all the 39 packages > remained Duplicate packages (other than a handful that are i

Re: Help needed: Intel-based Mac dual boot testing

On 10/23/24 2:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: [Snip] From googling around it looks like we *could* potentially support accessing and even maybe installing into a filevault setup, since cryptsetup supports it since 2022, but anaconda/blivet maybe just don't have support for this wired up the way

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 11:37 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 3:09 AM Brandon Nielsen via test < > test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > Not directly related to KDE / ARM, but did I somehow miss the announce > > emails? Now that I think about it, I haven't seen one for a can

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 12:49 -0500, Brandon Nielsen via test wrote: > On 10/23/24 4:37 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 3:09 AM Brandon Nielsen via test > > mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > > > Not directly related to KDE / ARM, but did I somehow miss the anno

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On 10/23/24 4:37 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 3:09 AM Brandon Nielsen via test mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: Not directly related to KDE / ARM, but did I somehow miss the announce emails? Now that I think about it, I haven't seen one for a candidate

Re: System doesn't fully wake from sleep when VM are in use

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 2:01 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:24 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > >> Oh, fun. I can reproduce this when I'm using user-session virtual >> machines (gnome-boxes or virt-manager). It doesn't happen when >> system-sessions VMs are used. >> That's a bummer. I'

Re: System doesn't fully wake from sleep when VM are in use

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:24 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > Oh, fun. I can reproduce this when I'm using user-session virtual machines > (gnome-boxes or virt-manager). It doesn't happen when system-sessions VMs > are used. > That's a bummer. I'll create a bug report and post it here. > Here we go: http

Re: System doesn't fully wake from sleep when VM are in use

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:52 PM Alessio wrote: > Indeed, issuing "sudo systemctl thaw user.slice" via ssh, the GDM login > screen reappears. > Oh, fun. I can reproduce this when I'm using user-session virtual machines (gnome-boxes or virt-manager). It doesn't happen when system-sessions VMs are

Re: System doesn't fully wake from sleep when VM are in use

It looks like the issue is here in "frozen" user session $ systemctl status session-4.scope ● session-4.scope - Session 4 of User alessio Loaded: loaded (/run/systemd/transient/session-4.scope; transient) Transient: yes Active: active (running) (frozen-by-parent) since Wed 2024-10-23

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 3:09 AM Brandon Nielsen via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Not directly related to KDE / ARM, but did I somehow miss the announce > emails? Now that I think about it, I haven't seen one for a candidate > compose in a couple of weeks either. > All the test/ca

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9:09 PM Brandon Nielsen via test wrote: > > On 10/22/24 4:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > The candidate release compose for Fedora Linux 41 was released > > yesterday[1], and we need YOUR help to ensure Fedora KDE is the best > > this cycle! Kamil Paral prov

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On 10/22/24 4:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: Hey folks, The candidate release compose for Fedora Linux 41 was released yesterday[1], and we need YOUR help to ensure Fedora KDE is the best this cycle! Kamil Paral provided some instructions on how to do this just after Fedora Linux 41 Beta went out[2] a

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

On 10/22/24 7:48 AM, Scott Dowdle via test wrote: On Monday, October 21st, 2024 at 5:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Hi All, I do not know if this is the correct place for this, but ... Now this is weird. Really, Really WEIRD! Yesterday I did the offline upgrade from FC39 to FC41 Beta

Re: Help needed: Intel-based Mac dual boot testing

On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 14:13, Kamil Paral wrote: > Hi folks, > if anyone has an Intel-based Mac (Macbook, Mac Mini) which could be used for > dual-boot testing with Fedora 41, that would be very helpful. We don't have > any such hardware at hand at the moment. Yes. And already on it. > https:

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:08 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:07 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 2:56 AM Neal Gompa via kde > > wrote: > >> > >> Hey folks, > >> > >> The candidate release compose for Fedora Linux 41 was released > >> yesterday[1], and w

Re: Fedora KDE 41 RC 1.3 needs testing!

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:07 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 2:56 AM Neal Gompa via kde > wrote: >> >> Hey folks, >> >> The candidate release compose for Fedora Linux 41 was released >> yesterday[1], and we need YOUR help to ensure Fedora KDE is the best >> this cycle! Kamil P

Re: bugzilla won't let me register.

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 03:45:32PM -0400, Robert McBroom wrote: > Can't access bugzilla for fedora 41. The bugzilla login I've used no longer > works. tried to do a FAS registration but that doesn't work either. Can you perhaps expand on 'doesn't work' ? Do you get an error? > Can access the te

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

On Monday, October 21st, 2024 at 5:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: > Hi All, > > I do not know if this is the correct place for > this, but ... > > Now this is weird. Really, Really WEIRD! > > Yesterday I did the offline upgrade from FC39 to FC41 Beta. > > Now a fresh "# dnf upgrade" wa

Re: Upgrade to 41 from 39 stays on 39 but says it is 41

On 10/21/24 16:00, ToddAndMargo via test wrote: Hi All, I do not know if this is the correct place for this, but ... Now this is weird.  Really, Really WEIRD! Yesterday I did the offline upgrade from FC39 to FC41 Beta. Now a fresh "# dnf upgrade" wants to download 3000+ FC39 rpm's. And "rpm

Re: Self-introduction: Igor Jagec / igorjagec

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 00:11, Adam Williamson wrote: > Welcome Igor! Thanks a lot for getting involved. Alessio gave you a > great answer for testing work. For coding work, here's a few ideas... Thank you maestro Adam, Alesio is a star ;) > You could look at fedora-easy-karma: > https://pagure.

Re: QA:Testcase_firefox_media needs editing

Hey Andre, I will take a look at the test case and fix it ASAP. Thanks for letting me know!! ~sent from pixel5 On Mon, Oct 21, 2024, 11:47 AM Andre Robatino wrote: > Firefox recently removed Ogg video playback, only audio is left. (See > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-c6e0

Re: Removal of vesa and fbdev X.org drivers from Rawhide and Fedora 41

On Thu, 2024-10-17 at 19:42 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 16:48, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 10:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I noticed that the vesa and fbdev X.org drivers were recently retired > > > from Rawhide. There appears to be n

Re: Removal of vesa and fbdev X.org drivers from Rawhide and Fedora 41

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 16:48, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 10:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I noticed that the vesa and fbdev X.org drivers were recently retired > > from Rawhide. There appears to be no Change for this. The commit > > messages for the retirements refer t

Re: Removal of vesa and fbdev X.org drivers from Rawhide and Fedora 41

On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 10:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I noticed that the vesa and fbdev X.org drivers were recently retired > from Rawhide. There appears to be no Change for this. The commit > messages for the retirements refer to this old Change: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/R

Re: Self-introduction: Igor Jagec / igorjagec

On Wed, 2024-10-16 at 20:10 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote: > Hi Fedora QA Team, > > I was inspired to join the Fedora QA community after listening to the > recent Fedora podcast on QA – it really resonated with me! > > I'm Igor Jagec (FAS nickname: igorjagec). My open source journey began > over 20 yea

Re: Self-introduction: Igor Jagec / igorjagec

Hello Igor. Welcome to Fedora QA, I have sponsored you in the QA FAS group. You can start off by testing updates in for Fedora 39, Fedora 40, and Fedora 41. Update testing is where a tester tests a package and gives out a +1 Karma for PASS and -1 Karma for F

Re: dnf5-command(repomanage)

Am 11.10.24 um 5:37 AM schrieb Sumantro Mukherjee: Hey Robert, Thank you for reaching out. The repomanage was supposed to be developed as plugin and it has been slated in some later version. This means once you upgrade to F41; this won't work. What are people supposed to use instead? I hav

Re: Log your reports for F41 Upgrade Test Days

Me and lemonzest logged our testing with the GNOME version earlier today Den mån 14 okt. 2024 kl 10:36 skrev Luna Jernberg : > Decided to jump in and test today > > Den mån 14 okt. 2024 kl 04:30 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee < > sumuk...@redhat.com>: > >> Hey All, >> >> A gentle reminder, today will b

Re: 2024-10-14 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora Quality Meeting

Will join today, however not joining the blocker meeting afterwards Den sön 13 okt. 2024 kl 17:36 skrev Adam Williamson : > > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting > # Date: 2024-10-14 > # Time: 15:00 UTC > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) > # Location: > https://matrix.to/#/#

Re: Log your reports for F41 Upgrade Test Days

Decided to jump in and test today Den mån 14 okt. 2024 kl 04:30 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee : > Hey All, > > A gentle reminder, today will be the last day to record your upgrade > experiences in [0] > This will help us not only know the problems you faced (if at all any) and > then resolve > them (i

Re: nomodeset kernel parameter appears to cause startx failure

On 10/13/24 9:22 PM, Felix Miata wrote: Samuel Sieb composed on 2024-10-13 16:58 (UTC-0700): George R Goffe wrote: I have used nomodeset for so long I don't recall which driver I've been expecting to use. My reason(s) for using nomodeset started several years ago... I think it was becau

Re: nomodeset kernel parameter appears to cause startx failure

Samuel Sieb composed on 2024-10-13 16:58 (UTC-0700): > George R Goffe wrote: >> I have used nomodeset for so long I don't recall which driver I've been >> expecting to use. >> My reason(s) for using nomodeset started several years ago... I think it was >> because of the turmoil related to driv

Re: nomodeset kernel parameter appears to cause startx failure

On 10/13/24 4:33 PM, George R Goffe via test wrote: Adam, Thanks to you and Sergio for responding to my query... It's appreciated. I have used nomodeset for so long I don't recall which driver I've been expecting to use. My reason(s) for using nomodeset started several years ago... I think i

Re: nomodeset kernel parameter appears to cause startx failure

Adam, Thanks to you and Sergio for responding to my query... It's appreciated. I have used nomodeset for so long I don't recall which driver I've been expecting to use. My reason(s) for using nomodeset started several years ago... I think it was because of the turmoil related to driver update

Re: dnf5-command(repomanage)

Hey Robert, Thank you for reaching out. The repomanage was supposed to be developed as plugin and it has been slated in some later version. This means once you upgrade to F41; this won't work. I have added this email as ref to bump the issue this is getting tracked in [0] We are doing a test week

Re: Proposing Beta UT package set enable Release Criteria

On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 3:21 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > *modular* should be gone completely now, so drop mention of it? >> > > In that case Kevin, I will also have to update a few more places. Given > Adamw and Kamil agree :) > I think it's fine to drop modular mentions in all places (there m

Re: Proposing Beta UT package set enable Release Criteria

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 7:09 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 7:36 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: >> >> Proposed Beta Criteria: >> >> Release identification >> A fedora-release package containing the correct names and information and a >> fedora-repos package containing the correct

Re: Proposing Beta UT package set enable Release Criteria

On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 7:36 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Proposed Beta Criteria: > > Release identification > A fedora-release package containing the correct names and information and > a fedora-repos package containing the correct repository configuration for > a Beta Fedora release must be pr

Re: Removal of vesa and fbdev X.org drivers from Rawhide

On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 11:02 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Peter Robinson writes: > > Hello Peter and Adam, > > > Hi Adam, > > > > > I noticed that the vesa and fbdev X.org drivers were recently > > > retired > > > from Rawhide. There appears to be no Change for this. The commit > >

Re: Removal of vesa and fbdev X.org drivers from Rawhide

Hi Adam, > I noticed that the vesa and fbdev X.org drivers were recently retired > from Rawhide. There appears to be no Change for this. The commit > messages for the retirements refer to this old Change: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceFbdevDrivers#Detailed_Description > > but t

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >