On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 20:10 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 1 November 2010 17:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > A few days after would be rather bad and should have been previously
> > clearly communicated, given that preupgrade is one of our official 'Good
> > Ways To Upgrade' and lots of people
> - Original Message -
> From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> To: For testers of Fedora development releases
>
> Sent: Mon Nov 01 13:20:35 2010
> Subject: Re: Preupgrade change?
>
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
On 1 November 2010 17:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
> A few days after would be rather bad and should have been previously
> clearly communicated, given that preupgrade is one of our official 'Good
> Ways To Upgrade' and lots of people want to upgrade on release day. If
> there's a significant chance
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 19:19 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> That might be the case in the US, its not the case in the UK and
> Australia where I use 3G for everything from video streaming and VoIP
> to remote access work related things with no issues at all.
try it on a train from London to Manche
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 13:26 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > The N900 is unfortunately impractical in territories with no 1700 or
> > 2100 band providers (or poor ones).
>
> For 3G, yes, but I live with 2.5G service as I'm almost always near a
> WLAN AP. (I don't hav
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> The N900 is unfortunately impractical in territories with no 1700 or
>> 2100 band providers (or poor ones).
>
> For 3G, yes, but I live with 2.5G service as I'm almost always near a
> WLAN AP. (I don't have 1700
Oops. I meant correct use of the "refers-to" header. Thread completeness
relying *only* on refers-to is based on an incorrect assumption that
refers-to is compulsory and not optional. IMHO.
Jan
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
Adam Williamson wrote:
> The N900 is unfortunately impractical in territories with no 1700 or
> 2100 band providers (or poor ones).
For 3G, yes, but I live with 2.5G service as I'm almost always near a
WLAN AP. (I don't have 1700 or 2100 service near me). The N900 should be
able to provide voice
And as a closing one for OT stuff - the correct use of reply-to is
unfortunately optional in the RFC. I knew all of this hence my excuse. Still
noone has reacted to the point I raised.
But as at least one person on this list values thraed-completeness over
content, I gather it is better to simp
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 13:04 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Jan Wildeboer wrote:
> > (Sorry for top-posting, blame blackberry and me)
>
> ... and it broke the thread. You should tell your employer to provide
> you a more FOSS friendly device (a.k.a. Nokia N900).
The N900 is unfortunately imp
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Jan Wildeboer wrote:
> > (Sorry for top-posting, blame blackberry and me)
>
> ... and it broke the thread. You should tell your employer to provide
> you a more FOSS friendly device (a.k.a. Nokia N900).
>
>
LOL, yeah! What kind of a fre
Jan Wildeboer wrote:
> (Sorry for top-posting, blame blackberry and me)
... and it broke the thread. You should tell your employer to provide
you a more FOSS friendly device (a.k.a. Nokia N900).
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
ov 01 13:20:35 2010
Subject: Re: Preupgrade change?
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote:
> > *
> > https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote:
> > *
> > https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dcc&old=data%404157e81ce428be819a957a31be5a19bcc6bd2efe
> > Shouldn't Rawhide always st
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:21 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:11 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote:
> > > > *
> > > > https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:11 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote:
> > > *
> > > https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dcc&old=data%404157e81ce428
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote:
> > *
> > https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dcc&old=data%404157e81ce428be819a957a31be5a19bcc6bd2efe
> > Shouldn't Rawhide always st
On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote:
> *
> https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dcc&old=data%404157e81ce428be819a957a31be5a19bcc6bd2efe
> Shouldn't Rawhide always stay in the list of releases?
No, we can no longer preupgrade to r
18 matches
Mail list logo
