Re: Re: Re: [Fedora QA] #152: Test Cases Management

2010-12-03 Thread James Laska
Just a few extra thoughts on the subject ... On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 07:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 16:06 +0100, xcieja wrote: > > Hi, > > yes, you are right there are tests, but in my opinion they are in few > > different places under different categories. > > That w

Re: Re: Re: [Fedora QA] #152: Test Cases Management

2010-12-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 16:06 +0100, xcieja wrote: > Hi, > yes, you are right there are tests, but in my opinion they are in few > different places under different categories. That wasn't what I meant: I meant we already use the Wiki for the purposes you identified as an advantage of a TCMS (listi

Re: Re: Re: [Fedora QA] #152: Test Cases Management

2010-12-03 Thread xcieja
Hi, yes, you are right there are tests, but in my opinion they are in few different places under different categories. I think we could organise them better -i.e create test category and put all of them instead of many places. Moreover, i just have taken a look briefly and i see there are round

Re: Re: [Fedora QA] #152: Test Cases Management

2010-12-02 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 23:12 +0100, xcieja wrote: > Hi, > i can say i am new to Fedora in general as project but i have > participated in many testing campaigns professionaly, so honestly i see > this TCMS(?) or any other way to organise test cases as big add value. > > It would be really great i

Re: Re: [Fedora QA] #152: Test Cases Management

2010-12-02 Thread xcieja
Hi, i can say i am new to Fedora in general as project but i have participated in many testing campaigns professionaly, so honestly i see this TCMS(?) or any other way to organise test cases as big add value. It would be really great if we had a list of test cases for whole system (of course ev