On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 13:36 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Please, tagged with keywords of ui-review -- thanks!
Finally got down to filing it:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738825
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Com
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 01:36:46PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> The value is used here:
> https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/blob/master/backends/hif/pk-backend-hif.c#L2934
> -- nothing ever changes the default value. If you can give me a good
> use case on why this should be configurable, the
On 10 October 2014 13:21, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I thought so. Is there a place one could add things like installonly
> then? If not, what does it do by default? I mean, how did it decide that
> I had five kernels and installing a new one, making it six, implied
> removing three older ones:
The val
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:50 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 10 October 2014 11:24, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >> Try 'pkcon get-transactions'.
> > Hrm - that works, obviously.
>
> Or if you install gnome-packagekit, gpk-log
>
> > Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use
>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> No, libhif uses the yumdb as well. I've got no idea why dnf doesn't
> use the yumdb as it seems to be the same format but in a different
> place.
>
yumdb is a private yum data, so dnf has its own one, so dnf don't mess up
anything for yum
On 10 October 2014 12:27, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> So PackageKit, dnf & yum all have there own package transaction history.
No, libhif uses the yumdb as well. I've got no idea why dnf doesn't
use the yumdb as it seems to be the same format but in a different
place.
Richard
--
test mailing list
te
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
> 2014-10-10 13:50 GMT+03:00 Richard Hughes :
> >> Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use
> >> yum.conf? I had the install only limit set to 5 in dnf.conf, not in
> >> yum.conf, and g-s removed 3 of my older ker
On 10 October 2014 12:00, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
> 2014-10-10 13:50 GMT+03:00 Richard Hughes :
>> No, it doesn't use yum at all.
> What does it use?
The librpm, hawkey and librepo libraries. We don't want to use DNF
itself as that would mean going from C->python->C for a low latency
parallel des
2014-10-10 13:50 GMT+03:00 Richard Hughes :
>> Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use
>> yum.conf? I had the install only limit set to 5 in dnf.conf, not in
>> yum.conf, and g-s removed 3 of my older kernels.
>
> No, it doesn't use yum at all.
What does it use?
http:/
On 10 October 2014 11:24, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> Try 'pkcon get-transactions'.
> Hrm - that works, obviously.
Or if you install gnome-packagekit, gpk-log
> Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use
> yum.conf? I had the install only limit set to 5 in dnf.conf, not in
> y
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 03:10 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 10:52 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Where can I find the transaction history of an update that was used
> > gnome-software?
>
> Try 'pkcon get-transactions'.
Hrm - that works, obviously.
Follow up
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 10:52 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Where can I find the transaction history of an update that was used
> gnome-software?
Try 'pkcon get-transactions'.
> Given that updates using software cannot undone, should we maybe limit
> gnome-software only to packages in th
Hello,
Where can I find the transaction history of an update that was used
gnome-software? This is on F21, and it should probably be using the
hawkey backend. My system wouldn't come up after an update and I need to
see what packages were updated to narrow down the misbehaving package :)
Given th
13 matches
Mail list logo
