On 03/31/2012 12:04 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> on gdm? why not filtering out by defaul the famous non-human users,
>>> like
>>> mysql and postgresql?
>> We could do that, but it's not a very scalable or upstream friendly answer
>> (since
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 12:26 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:40:46 +0200,
>> Joachim Backes wrote:
>> >On 03/31/2012 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> >> I found the code used. It is in the accountsservices p
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 12:26 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:40:46 +0200,
>Joachim Backes wrote:
> >On 03/31/2012 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >> I found the code used. It is in the accountsservices package, not gdm as
> >> expected.
> >>
> >> There is a list of
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 09:57 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> It looks like they aren't checking /etc/shells. I couldn't find the code
> they use to build the list. They do appear to be black listing /sbin/nologin.
> There are a few accounts that don't have /sbin/nologin as a shell, but
> don't s
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:40:46 +0200,
Joachim Backes wrote:
On 03/31/2012 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I found the code used. It is in the accountsservices package, not gdm as
expected.
There is a list of excluded users and any users with a shell that has
a basename of false or "nologi
On 03/31/2012 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I found the code used. It is in the accountsservices package, not gdm as
> expected.
>
> There is a list of excluded users and any users with a shell that has
> a basename of false or "nologin" are also excepted.
>
> The list of excluded users is
I found the code used. It is in the accountsservices package, not gdm as
expected.
There is a list of excluded users and any users with a shell that has
a basename of false or "nologin" are also excepted.
The list of excluded users is currently:
bin, root, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, hal
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:36:27 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:58:03 +0200,
Joachim Backes wrote:
Are you sure? I went to /bin, made "ln -s bash mysql-bash" and changed
the login shell for the mysql account in /etc/passwd to /bin/mysql-bash,
but the login for mys
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:58:03 +0200,
Joachim Backes wrote:
Are you sure? I went to /bin, made "ln -s bash mysql-bash" and changed
the login shell for the mysql account in /etc/passwd to /bin/mysql-bash,
but the login for mysql still shows up on the login screen :-)
No I am not sure. I th
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> on gdm? why not filtering out by defaul the famous non-human users,
>> like
>> mysql and postgresql?
> We could do that, but it's not a very scalable or upstream friendly answer
> (since different upstreams might have different accoun
On 03/30/2012 11:28 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 23:29:08 +0300,
>cornel panceac wrote:
>> 2012/3/30 Ray Strode
>>
>>> why not offer to 'root' user a list of users that can be displayed or not
>> on gdm? why not filtering out by defaul the famous non-human users, like
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 23:29:08 +0300,
cornel panceac wrote:
2012/3/30 Ray Strode
why not offer to 'root' user a list of users that can be displayed or not
on gdm? why not filtering out by defaul the famous non-human users, like
mysql and postgresql?
You can change the shells of these a
Hi,
> on gdm? why not filtering out by defaul the famous non-human users,
> like
> mysql and postgresql?
We could do that, but it's not a very scalable or upstream friendly answer
(since different upstreams might have different account names for these users).
It's something worth considering tho
2012/3/30 Ray Strode
> Hi,
>
> - Original Message -
> > Anybody sees this too: After applying all F17 updates (including
> > gnome-3.4... packages), the GDM login window presents the mysql
> > server
> > account on the login screen. Why that?
> The issue arised, becase we no longer filter
Hi,
- Original Message -
> Anybody sees this too: After applying all F17 updates (including
> gnome-3.4... packages), the GDM login window presents the mysql
> server
> account on the login screen. Why that?
The issue arised, becase we no longer filter users less than UID_MIN in
/etc/logi
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 09:41 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 14:59:08 +0200,
>Joachim Backes wrote:
> >Anybody sees this too: After applying all F17 updates (including
> >gnome-3.4... packages), the GDM login window presents the mysql server
> >account on the login scree
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 14:59:08 +0200,
Joachim Backes wrote:
Anybody sees this too: After applying all F17 updates (including
gnome-3.4... packages), the GDM login window presents the mysql server
account on the login screen. Why that?
Because mysql has a normal shell.
I think the scheme u
Anybody sees this too: After applying all F17 updates (including
gnome-3.4... packages), the GDM login window presents the mysql server
account on the login screen. Why that?
Kind regards
--
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signat
18 matches
Mail list logo
