On 05/03/2012 03:59 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 3.5.2012 00:31, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Frequent hangs for anywhere from a second to 30 seconds. Lack of
responsiveness to key and button presses. Delays from when I clicked
a scroll bar and dragged it to when the window actually scrolled.
Frequent lon
On 3.5.2012 00:31, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Frequent hangs for anywhere from a second to 30 seconds. Lack of
responsiveness to key and button presses. Delays from when I clicked
a scroll bar and dragged it to when the window actually scrolled.
Frequent long delays from when an external app tried to
Frequent hangs for anywhere from a second to 30 seconds. Lack of responsiveness
to key and button presses. Delays from when I clicked a scroll bar and dragged
it to when the window actually scrolled. Frequent long delays from when an
external app tried to launch a page to when the tab actually o
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 10:14 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2012 09:50:22 -0400
> Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
> > Does anybody have any thoughts?
>
> My only thought is that firefox became popular mainly because
> it wasn't a slow bloated mess, now it has evolved into a slow
> bloated mes
On 5/1/12 6:09 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:51:08 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
- xulrunner maybe shouldn't assert PRIMARY ownership in this case
That's the point for me: What on earth in the bookmarks
sidebar needs or wants the selection? And it is a super
long delay just in fir
On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:51:08 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> - xulrunner maybe shouldn't assert PRIMARY ownership in this case
That's the point for me: What on earth in the bookmarks
sidebar needs or wants the selection? And it is a super
long delay just in firefox.
I can run other apps that really
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 14:22 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012 14:11:15 -0400
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > In my experience, extremely slow FF performance is usually due to
> > writing out either the assorted sqlite data files in the profile
> > directory, or the big javascript pile
On Tue, 1 May 2012 14:11:15 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> In my experience, extremely slow FF performance is usually due to
> writing out either the assorted sqlite data files in the profile
> directory, or the big javascript pile that is the session storage.
I've got one really weird slowdown I
Jonathan Kamens (j...@kamens.us) said:
> I restarted Firefox many times. I restarted gnome-shell. I restarted
> my machine. Nothing helped. Performance was poor immediately after
> the restart. There was no perceivable degradation over time -- it
> was extremely poor right from when it started up
On 5/1/2012 1:53 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
IMHO it was the restart that "fixed" it. I experience this "getting
slow" think to happen for a long time. After several days of run,
firefox needs to be restarted. 1. it's taking too much RAM, 2. usually
causing higher CPU load than after restart with sa
On Tue, 1 May 2012, Pedro Francisco wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
I thought I would try moving my profile out of the way to see if performance
would improve, so I shut down Firefox and moved ~/.mozilla/firefox/*.default
somewhere else. But then when I tried to r
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> I thought I would try moving my profile out of the way to see if performance
> would improve, so I shut down Firefox and moved ~/.mozilla/firefox/*.default
> somewhere else. But then when I tried to restart Firefox, it said that it
> was alr
well Jonathan Kamens you are bit lucky :) because i dont see any
major changes after doing the same it's still slow
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 5/1/2012 10:28 AM, David wrote:
>
> The major of the 'Firefox is slow' problems are caused by misbehaving
> themes and
On 5/1/2012 10:28 AM, David wrote:
The major of the 'Firefox is slow' problems are caused by misbehaving
themes and extensions and the the 'remnants' that some of them leave in
the configuration files.
Yes, I'm aware of that, but that doesn't explain why moving my entire
~/.mozilla/firefox direc
On 5/1/2012 10:14 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2012 09:50:22 -0400
> Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
>> Does anybody have any thoughts?
>
> My only thought is that firefox became popular mainly because
> it wasn't a slow bloated mess, now it has evolved into a slow
> bloated mess, and chrome
Hi
Jonathan Kamens
i am facing the same problems with firefox 12.0 in fedora 16 x86_64 it
takes more then
10 seconds to open and more then 5 secs to open a new tab
well i didn't tried anything fix it yet but i will also try to do the same hope
it will fix some issues
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:20
On Tue, 01 May 2012 09:50:22 -0400
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Does anybody have any thoughts?
My only thought is that firefox became popular mainly because
it wasn't a slow bloated mess, now it has evolved into a slow
bloated mess, and chrome is becoming popular because it isn't
a slow bloated mess
Hi everyone,
I was seeing really, really poor performance from Firefox. I'm not sure
exactly when it started being a problem, but it was going on for at
least a week and I certainly saw it with Firefox 12 (in F17 x86_64).
I thought I would try moving my profile out of the way to see if
perfo
18 matches
Mail list logo
