On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 15:55 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Hi folks,
> thanks for your feedback in the last few days. I've created two wiki pages
> about
> packages which don't execute their tests in %check:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Testing_in_check
>
> and another one for packages
On 02/27/2014 09:18 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:55:02PM +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> thanks for your feedback in the last few days. I've created two wiki
>> pages about packages which don't execute their tests in %check:
>> https://fedoraproject.org
На 27.02.2014 18:14, Christopher Meng написа:
Interesting :
fedora-release-notes
***-fonts
Can someone point me how to test them?
See amiri-fonts, gnu-free-fonts and thai-scalable-fonts. These appear to have
some sort of testing available in the source and all three seem to be different.
Interesting :
fedora-release-notes
***-fonts
Can someone point me how to test them?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
На 27.02.2014 16:18, Richard W.M. Jones написа:
Attached is a proposed patch to the spec file. I ran this under
auto-buildrequires to see if it would need any extra BRs, but auto-br
didn't find any.
Richard,
can you point me to what auto-buildrequires is, where it lives and how do I use
it?
Hi folks,
thanks for your feedback in the last few days. I've created two wiki pages about
packages which don't execute their tests in %check:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Testing_in_check
and another one for packages which don't seem to have test suites at all:
https://fedoraproject.org/w
