Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 05:13 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > Well, pots and kettles aside: > > I just ran the update. The only thing I'm curious about: > > 1. Fedup did not start any kind of GUI. It stayed in command-line prompt > mode. Actually that was an improvement: I could better watch its > prog

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 12/20/2013 05:04 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote: On 19/12/13 23:49, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Gavin Flower mailto:gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz>> wrote: long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I probably would run it when I had to be

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 19/12/13 23:49, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Gavin Flower mailto:gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz>> wrote: long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I probably would run it when I had to be away from it anyway. You see, in Americ

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 20/12/13 12:50, Gavin Flower wrote: On 20/12/13 12:51, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 12:44 +1300, Gavin Flower wrote: Can there be anything more important than the correct way to make tea??? Sure - vim versus emacs! Possibly a close second... Then again, some people might c

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 20/12/13 12:51, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 12:44 +1300, Gavin Flower wrote: Can there be anything more important than the correct way to make tea??? Sure - vim versus emacs! Possibly a close second... -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 12:44 +1300, Gavin Flower wrote: > Can there be anything more important than the correct way to make > tea??? Sure - vim versus emacs! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassass

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Gavin Flower wrote: > long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I > probably would run it when I had to be away from it anyway. You see, > in America we have a saying: "A watched teapot never boils." > > It's an old English saying in fact :)

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

Can there be anything more important than the correct way to make tea??? On 20/12/13 12:39, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: Are you guys overtired or something? ;) Thanks, Phil On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 10:39

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 20/12/13 12:21, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 10:39 +1300, Gavin Flower wrote: On 20/12/13 06:38, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 05:08 -0500, Temlakos wrote: [...] long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I probably would run it when I h

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

Are you guys overtired or something? ;) Thanks, Phil On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 10:39 +1300, Gavin Flower wrote: > > On 20/12/13 06:38, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 05:08 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > > [...] > > > long

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 10:39 +1300, Gavin Flower wrote: > On 20/12/13 06:38, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 05:08 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > [...] > > long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I > > probably would run it when I had to be away from it anyway.

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 12/19/2013 04:39 PM, Gavin Flower wrote: On 20/12/13 06:38, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 05:08 -0500, Temlakos wrote: [...] long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I probably would run it when I had to be away from it anyway. You see, in America we ha

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:39:04 +1300 Gavin Flower wrote: eapot never boils." > > It's an old English saying in fact :) > Even an unwatched _*teapot*_ should not boil! > My Dad used boil it, crude oil yeuk! -- Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 20/12/13 06:38, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 05:08 -0500, Temlakos wrote: [...] long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I probably would run it when I had to be away from it anyway. You see, in America we have a saying: "A watched teapot never boils."

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 13:39 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > On 12/19/2013 12:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 05:08 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > > > > > The newest version of fedup available to me (not using > updates-testing) is 0.7. ne > > Is someone going to push

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 12/19/2013 12:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 05:08 -0500, Temlakos wrote: The newest version of fedup available to me (not using updates-testing) is 0.7. ne Is someone going to push fedup version 0,8 to updates (stable) soon? Do I wait for that? Or enable updates-testi

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 05:08 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > > > The newest version of fedup available to me (not using > > > updates-testing) is 0.7. ne > > > > > > Is someone going to push fedup version 0,8 to updates (stable) soon? > > > Do I wait for that? Or enable updates-testing and run an update

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 12/18/2013 09:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 18:58 -0500, Temlakos wrote: On 12/18/2013 06:50 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: * I don't actually know one way or another but it feels like it might just be similar in my case since I've confirmed I'm

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 18:58 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > On 12/18/2013 06:50 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > > * I don't actually know one way or another but it feels like > > it might just be similar in my case since I've confirmed I'm > > using 0.8 and it's no different. Has

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

from the wiki... "*Usually, it is best to try first with the latest fedup available in the stable update repository for the release you are running. If you encounter problems with the upgrade, and a newer fedup is available in the updates-testing repository for your current release, you may wish t

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 12/18/2013 06:50 PM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: * I don't actually know one way or another but it feels like it might just be similar in my case since I've confirmed I'm using 0.8 and it's no different. Has anyone else *not* fixed this with the suggested update? Thanks, Phil

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

- I don't actually know one way or another but it feels like it might just be similar in my case since I've confirmed I'm using 0.8 and it's no different. Has anyone else *not* fixed this with the suggested update? Thanks, Phil On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

BrunoJCM (Enviado do Tablet) Em 17/12/2013 13:13, "Neal Becker" escreveu: > > success/failure? I had this one, I reported on this list a few weeks ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863 fedup 0.8 also fixed the problem for me. Thanks, -- Bruno Medeiros -- test mailing list t

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 13:15 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > In case there clues here I'm not seeing, this is what I get after the > fedup --network 20 command: > > > WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test: > broken dependencies > kmod-VirtualBox-3.11.9-200.fc19.x86_6

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

In case there clues here I'm not seeing, this is what I get after the fedup --network 20 command: WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test: broken dependencies kmod-VirtualBox-3.11.9-200.fc19.x86_64-4.3.4-1.fc19.x86_64 requires kernel-3.11.9-200.fc19.x86_64, kernel-3.11.10-

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 00:55 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > If anyone else is having such errors, is your rootfs btrfs by any chance? > > On Dec 17, 2013, at 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I can only think that using fedup 0.7 agains

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > If anyone else is having such errors, is your rootfs btrfs by any chance? On Dec 17, 2013, at 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I can only think that using fedup 0.7 against upgrade > kernel/image built with fedup-dracut 0.8 doesn't work.

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 12/18/2013 08:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Dec 17, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: Yeah I just did an F18 live desktop install to kvm, installed 0.7.3-4, ran it with: fedup --network 20 --debuglog fedupdebug.log The download is fine. The grub.cfg is correct. The reboot fails and

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Dec 17, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Yeah I just did an F18 live desktop install to kvm, installed 0.7.3-4, ran it > with: > > fedup --network 20 --debuglog fedupdebug.log > > The download is fine. The grub.cfg is correct. The reboot fails and before I > can read anything it

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 23:07 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > >>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 16:02 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Dec 17, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 23:07 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Adam Williamson >>> wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 16:02 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: So it appears I'm stuck at "mounted /boot." At th

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 23:07 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 16:02 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > > So it appears I'm stuck at "mounted /boot." At the top I can see an > > > error "Start Load Kernel Modules

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 16:02 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > So it appears I'm stuck at "mounted /boot." At the top I can see an > > error "Start Load Kernel Modules" "FAILED" or something similar. > > Can you get the precise messa

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

Pics are awaiting approval by the moderator... Thanks, Phil On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 16:02 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > So it appears I'm stuck at "mounted /boot." At the top I can see an > > error "Start Load Kernel Modules" "FA

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 16:02 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > So it appears I'm stuck at "mounted /boot." At the top I can see an > error "Start Load Kernel Modules" "FAILED" or something similar. Can you get the precise message, and/or a picture of the screen? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

So it appears I'm stuck at "mounted /boot." At the top I can see an error "Start Load Kernel Modules" "FAILED" or something similar. Thanks, Phil On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Philippe LeCavalier < supp...@plecavalier.com> wrote: > Okay. Thanks! I'll try that tonight. > > Thanks, Phil > >

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > success/failure? I had total success about 10 days ago with fedup f19->f20 on two different x86_64 systems: a Thinkpad 400 and an el-cheapo Acer AMD dual-core desktop. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https:/

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

Okay. Thanks! I'll try that tonight. Thanks, Phil On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 11:29 -0600, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > Agreed. I only supplied the info that was given on the screen. When I > > boot into F20 to perform the fedup I don't g

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 11:29 -0600, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > Agreed. I only supplied the info that was given on the screen. When I > boot into F20 to perform the fedup I don't get past the > progress-bar-type splash screen and thus have no details to provide > other than the aforementioned. Perh

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

Agreed. I only supplied the info that was given on the screen. When I boot into F20 to perform the fedup I don't get past the progress-bar-type splash screen and thus have no details to provide other than the aforementioned. Perhaps calling it an "error" was an error ;) On the same note; how do I

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 11:30 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > Sure but I still couldn't successfully complete the fedup 20 due to > the "notice". I don't think that's correct. I had one of these notices on my upgrade, and the upgrade worked. I'm not saying you didn't have a problem, I'm saying

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On 12/17/2013 07:13 AM, Neal Becker wrote: success/failure? Success on two machines. I did have to import keys for the rpmfusion repos, though. Otherwise, worked like a charm. Fedup is a huge improvement over preupgrade. -- Joel -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubsc

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

Sure but I still couldn't successfully complete the fedup 20 due to the "notice". On Dec 17, 2013 11:14 AM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 09:19 -0600, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > Failed for me on 64-bit. However, error was 'no updates for following > > pckgs' and pckgs in q

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 10:13 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > success/failure? Quite a few people have reported success on G+ and in the forums, that I've seen. Aside from validation testing (where it worked, of course) I fedup'ed my server VM host from 18 to 20 without issues yesterday. Heck, I fedup'e

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 09:19 -0600, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > Failed for me on 64-bit. However, error was 'no updates for following > pckgs' and pckgs in question(allot) were almost all non-stock/post > install. That's not an error, it's just an informational message. If that was the _only_ mess

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

Yes and no. I couldn't boot into 20 at all. But I easily recovered by simply choosing the previous F19 entry in GRUB. Thanks, Phil On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > Did it fail badly - leaving you a mess? > > Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > > Failed for me on 64-bit. Howev

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

Did it fail badly - leaving you a mess? Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > Failed for me on 64-bit. However, error was 'no updates for following > pckgs' and pckgs in question(allot) were almost all non-stock/post install. > > This was about 3 days ago. > > Thanks, Phil > > > > > On Tue, Dec 17,

Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?

Failed for me on 64-bit. However, error was 'no updates for following pckgs' and pckgs in question(allot) were almost all non-stock/post install. This was about 3 days ago. Thanks, Phil On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > success/failure? > > -- > test mailing list > test@

any report of fedup f19->f20?

success/failure? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test