On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 11:55 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:08:53 -0600,
> John Watzke wrote:
> >Take a look at the Bodhi page for this package:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/accountsservice-0.6.5-1.fc15,gdm-2.91.93-1.fc15?_csrf_token=579900300f9483a3
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:08:53 -0600,
John Watzke wrote:
>Take a look at the Bodhi page for this package:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/accountsservice-0.6.5-1.fc15,gdm-2.91.93-1.fc15?_csrf_token=579900300f9483a30ed72f7bdec5bc57f9d9d3e5
>
>GDM was accidentally released wit
Take a look at the Bodhi page for this package:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/accountsservice-0.6.5-1.fc15,gdm-2.91.93-1.fc15?_csrf_token=579900300f9483a30ed72f7bdec5bc57f9d9d3e5
GDM was accidentally released without the accountsservice package
update. If you've already gotten GDM
2011/3/9 Rob Healey:
> To those of you who have not updated to gnome-2.91.91:
>
> I would exclude the gdm package as it would not allow me to log back into my
> computer either as normal or root user!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683157
The trouble actually started with gdm-2.91.92
On 03/09/2011 05:53 AM, Rob Healey wrote:
> To those of you who have not updated to gnome-2.91.91:
>
> I would exclude the gdm package as it would not allow me to log back
> into my computer either as normal or root user!
>
> The update will continue without the gdm package!
>
> If you can get it
I'm using the 32-bit gnome-2.91.91 and I'm not having any problem with
the gdm and loging in has user. I know that doesn't help much, but it
works here.
Dan Carruthers
Rob Healey wrote:
To those of you who have not updated to gnome-2.91.91:
I would exclude the gdm package as it would no
To those of you who have not updated to gnome-2.91.91:
I would exclude the gdm package as it would not allow me to log back into my
computer either as normal or root user!
The update will continue without the gdm package!
If you can get it to work, would you please post back so that I may do so?