Re: mdraid with encrypted fs

2012-02-13 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 02/13/2012 09:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Yes - it has, what, a hundred or so tests? Most of those could be combined with at least one of the others...you don't need to be able to do the math very precisely to realize that we can't, practically speaking, have a test case for*every possible c

Re: mdraid with encrypted fs

2012-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 21:04 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 02/13/2012 08:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I'd suggest that this is 'supported' in terms of the release criteria, > > under the Final criterion "The installer must be able to create and > > install to any workable partition lay

Re: mdraid with encrypted fs

2012-02-13 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 02/13/2012 08:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: I'd suggest that this is 'supported' in terms of the release criteria, under the Final criterion "The installer must be able to create and install to any workable partition layout using any file system offered in a default installer configuration, LV

Re: mdraid with encrypted fs

2012-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 08:55 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > I installed a system fresh with Fedora 15 when it was released. I > configured the file system to have root on a software RAID 1 and then > encrypted the ext4 file system inside of the raid. > > I tried to upgrade to F16 a few days

Re: mdraid with encrypted fs

2012-02-13 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:55:11AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > In regards to the bug, am I stuck doing a yum > upgrade or is there a possible workaround to use preupgrade? > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753421 Just guessing here but if you are using preupgrade then

mdraid with encrypted fs

2012-02-13 Thread Michael Cronenworth
I installed a system fresh with Fedora 15 when it was released. I configured the file system to have root on a software RAID 1 and then encrypted the ext4 file system inside of the raid. I tried to upgrade to F16 a few days ago and ran into an Anaconda bug[1]. Is my particular use-case support