On 2012/05/10 19:09 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 11:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
repo=http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os
ip=192.168.1.2::192.168.1.1:255.255.255.0:m7ncd::none nameserver=192.168.1.1
rd.luks=0 rd.md=0 rd.dm=0 splash=verbo
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 06:35:52 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
Old habits die hard. I have to admit I never use ip either.
I found it useful for cases where I needed to have multiple layer 3 networks
on the same layer 2 network segment. For example when playing with
wireless routers. It is
On 2012/05/10 19:09 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 11:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
X.log shows 1152x864 as an available mode (but not a "built-in" mode).
Anaconda is using 1280x1024, having shifted up to a higher resolution,
resulting in tinier text than wanted
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 11:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/05/10 06:43 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
>
> >> eth0 except in Fedora
>
> > Oh, uh, just to make sure, you *did* change it to p11p1, right? I'm
>
> I don't recall any suggestion I needed to, so no.
oh, well I just figured
On 2012/05/09 13:32 (GMT+0100) Frank Murphy composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
Where's what dracut wants instead of all it claims is obsolete when I
try to use what's there for F17 installation via an installed Grub
Legacy stanza?
Is there some reason Fedora BFO won't suit?
https://boot.fedor
On 2012/05/10 06:43 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
eth0 except in Fedora
Oh, uh, just to make sure, you *did* change it to p11p1, right? I'm
I don't recall any suggestion I needed to, so no.
guessing 'yes', but trying to cover every option. So you did:
repo=http://mirrors.us.ker
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 22:07 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/05/09 11:38 (GMT-000) Adam Williamson composed:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >> I'm pretty sure it's just that networking isn't
> >> coming up right. It may well simply be an anaconda bug; I d
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 11:33 +0200, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:49:27AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> >
> > I never heard of an ip command before.
>
> What can I say? 'man ip', as used by Fedora 16, has "17 January 2002"
> for a timestamp and quite possibly this is not the
On 05/10/2012 11:33 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:49:27AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>>
>> I never heard of an ip command before.
>
> What can I say? 'man ip', as used by Fedora 16, has "17 January 2002"
> for a timestamp and quite possibly this is not the first version
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:49:27AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> I never heard of an ip command before.
What can I say? 'man ip', as used by Fedora 16, has "17 January 2002"
for a timestamp and quite possibly this is not the first version. For
all this time this was supposed to be "the command"
On 2012/05/10 09:30 (GMT+0200) Michal Jaegermann composed:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:53:28AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2012/05/09 21:27 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
>And is the network running when you get to the shell?
Same answer as 20 hours ago: "Not found ifconfig, tr
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:53:28AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/05/09 21:27 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
>
> >And is the network running when you get to the shell?
>
> Same answer as 20 hours ago: "Not found ifconfig, tracerte, ping.
But you likely have 'ip'. What 'ip addr' has t
On 2012/05/09 21:27 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
And is the network running when you get to the shell?
Same answer as 20 hours ago: "Not found ifconfig, tracerte, ping. Mount -t
nfs is found, but went into la la land for a while and then connection timed
out.", which basically means
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 22:07 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/05/09 11:38 (GMT-000) Adam Williamson composed:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >> I'm pretty sure it's just that networking isn't
> >> coming up right. It may well simply be an anaconda bug; I d
On 2012/05/09 11:38 (GMT-000) Adam Williamson composed:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm pretty sure it's just that networking isn't
coming up right. It may well simply be an anaconda bug; I don't know if
we've actually tested the static IP stuff very hard sinc
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 13:28 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> > On 2012/05/09 13:22 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
> >
> > > Dracut Warning: /dev/root does not exist
> > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
> > > Pid: 1, comm
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 13:31:42 -0400,
> Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:19:46 -0400,
>>> Tom H wrote:
Why do have both "enforcing=0" and "selinux=0"?
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/09/2012 01:51 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 13:31:42 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:19:46 -0400, Tom H
>>> wrote:
Why do have both
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 13:31:42 -0400,
Tom H wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:19:46 -0400,
Tom H wrote:
Why do have both "enforcing=0" and "selinux=0"?
Because they are different. enforcing=0 will run selinux in permissive
mode,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:19:46 -0400,
> Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Why do have both "enforcing=0" and "selinux=0"?
>
> Because they are different. enforcing=0 will run selinux in permissive
> mode, selinux=0 will disable selinux.
Exactly. Doesn
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 13:28 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/05/09 13:22 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
>
> > Dracut Warning: /dev/root does not exist
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
> > Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 3.3.4-3.fc17.i686 #1
> > Call Trace:
> > [] ? print
On 2012/05/09 13:22 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
Dracut Warning: /dev/root does not exist
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 3.3.4-3.fc17.i686 #1
Call Trace:
[] ? printk+0x2d/0x2f
[] panic+0x81/0x178
[] do_exit+0x7ff/0x800
[] do_group_exit+0x34
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/05/09 13:32 (GMT+0100) Frank Murphy composed:
>
>> Is there some reason Fedora BFO won't suit?
>> https://boot.fedoraproject.org/faq
>
> Thanks (I think, separate on-topic response to follow)! I never knew it
> existed. Several things ab
On 2012/05/09 06:51 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 05:13 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
I switched back to a variation on what I used prior to believing those dracut
boot messages:
title Install Fedora 17 - m.u.k.o HTTP (2012/05 anaconda)
kernel (hd0,6)/f17i
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:19:46 -0400,
Tom H wrote:
Why do have both "enforcing=0" and "selinux=0"?
Because they are different. enforcing=0 will run selinux in permissive
mode, selinux=0 will disable selinux.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.f
On 2012/05/09 13:32 (GMT+0100) Frank Murphy composed:
Is there some reason Fedora BFO won't suit?
https://boot.fedoraproject.org/faq
Thanks (I think, separate on-topic response to follow)! I never knew it
existed. Several things about Fedora 'conspired' to impede its discovery:
1-most test
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 05:13 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/05/08 22:37 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 01:30 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> title Install Fedora 17 - m.u.k.o HTTP (2012/05)
> >>kernel (hd0,6)/f17inst/vmlinuz
> >> repo=http://mirror
On 09/05/12 03:31, Felix Miata wrote:
Where's what dracut wants instead of all it claims is obsolete when I
try to use what's there for F17 installation via an installed Grub
Legacy stanza?
Is there some reason Fedora BFO won't suit?
https://boot.fedoraproject.org/faq
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> kernel (hd0,6)/f17inst/vmlinuz
> repo=http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os
> ip=192.168.1.2 gateway=192.168.1.1 netmask=255.255.255.0 dns=192.168.1.1
> rd.luks=0 rd.md=0 rd.dm=0 splash=verbose noipv6 enforcing=0 selinux=0
On 2012/05/08 22:37 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 01:30 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
title Install Fedora 17 - m.u.k.o HTTP (2012/05)
kernel (hd0,6)/f17inst/vmlinuz
repo=http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os
ip=192.168.1.2::192.168.1.1:
On 2012/05/08 22:37 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 01:30 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
title Install Fedora 17 - m.u.k.o HTTP (2012/05)
kernel (hd0,6)/f17inst/vmlinuz
repo=http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os
ip=192.168.1.2::192.168.1.1:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 01:30 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> > Don't use root=. Use repo= or stage2=. You will note that root= is not
> > listed anywhere on Anaconda_Boot_Options. This is intentional.
>
> It pervades http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dracut/Options. Which is the
> authority?
For anacond
On 2012/05/08 21:41 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 00:07 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2012/05/08 22:31 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
> Where's what dracut wants instead of all it claims is obsolete when I try to
> use what's there for F17 installation vi
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 00:07 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/05/08 22:31 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
>
> > Where's what dracut wants instead of all it claims is obsolete when I try to
> > use what's there for F17 installation via an installed Grub Legacy stanza?
> >
> > e.g.: Use 'ip=:::[:
On 2012/05/08 22:31 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
Where's what dracut wants instead of all it claims is obsolete when I try to
use what's there for F17 installation via an installed Grub Legacy stanza?
e.g.: Use 'ip=:::[:]'
Is there an extra ":" in there (a typo?)?
e.g.: "FATAL: Please sup
Where's what dracut wants instead of all it claims is obsolete when I try to
use what's there for F17 installation via an installed Grub Legacy stanza?
e.g.: Use 'ip=:::[:]'
Is there an extra ":" in there (a typo?)?
e.g.: "FATAL: Please supply bootdev argument for multiple ip= lines"
What on
36 matches
Mail list logo
