Re: ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

2018-03-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, 00:42 Adam Williamson, wrote: > On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 15:19 +, Randy Barlow wrote: > > Greetings! > > > > During Friday's FESCo meeting we learned that ppp is currently FTBFS > > on Fedora 28/Rawhide[0]. FESCo was unsure if this particular failure > > would cause ppp to f

Re: ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

2018-03-26 Thread Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
> On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 15:19 +, Randy Barlow wrote: > > Basically it'd require someone who uses ADSL via a dumb ADSL modem > plugged directly into their system via USB (*not* via an ADSL router > that their system is connected to via ethernet; in that configuration, > the router does this wor

Re: ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

2018-03-26 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:41:59 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 15:19 +, Randy Barlow wrote: > > Greetings! > > > > During Friday's FESCo meeting we learned that ppp is currently FTBFS > > on Fedora 28/Rawhide[0]. FESCo was unsure if this particular failure > > would cause

Re: ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

2018-03-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 15:19 +, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings! > > During Friday's FESCo meeting we learned that ppp is currently FTBFS > on Fedora 28/Rawhide[0]. FESCo was unsure if this particular failure > would cause ppp to fail in operation, or if it was simply a build > failure. Thus, w

ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

2018-03-25 Thread Randy Barlow
Greetings! During Friday's FESCo meeting we learned that ppp is currently FTBFS on Fedora 28/Rawhide[0]. FESCo was unsure if this particular failure would cause ppp to fail in operation, or if it was simply a build failure. Thus, we were unsure whether it should be considered a beta blocker, es