rawhide package lag

2011-04-15 Thread Andre Robatino
Why are many rawhide packages lagging so far behind F15 lately? For example, in rawhide, many gnome packages including gnome-panel are still at 2.91. Does it have anything to do with the trouble generating deltas ( https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4610 ) ? -- test mailing list test@lists.f

rawhide package lag

2011-04-15 Thread Andre Robatino
Peter Robinson gmail.com> writes: > Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They > don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable. > > They should really be building for rawhide first and then merging the > package repo back into F-15 and building it there, then submitti

Re: rawhide package lag

2011-04-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > Why are many rawhide packages lagging so far behind F15 lately? For example, > in > rawhide, many gnome packages including gnome-panel are still at 2.91. Does it > have anything to do with the trouble generating deltas ( > https://fedoraho

Re: rawhide package lag

2011-04-15 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 04/15/2011 05:41 PM, Andre Robatino wrote > Seems like it's pointless to have No Frozen Rawhide when it's usually behind > Branched anyway. Is AutoQA expected to eventually prevent builds happening > later on Rawhide? Or is it impractical to be that strict? (I seem to remember > someone saying s

Re: rawhide package lag

2011-04-15 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They > don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable. This has probably been discussed before, but why not import all newer f(n-1) builds automatically into rawhide? Might provide so

Re: rawhide package lag

2011-04-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:27:39 -0600, OP wrote: > On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They > > don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable. > > This has probably been discussed before, but why not import all newer f(n

Re: rawhide package lag

2011-04-15 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 04/15/2011 09:02 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:27:39 -0600, OP wrote: > >> On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They >>> don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable. >> >> This has probably be

Re: rawhide package lag

2011-04-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:24:51 -0600, OP wrote: > On 04/15/2011 09:02 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:27:39 -0600, OP wrote: > > > >> On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >>> Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They > >>> don't get into raw