On 10/10/2011 01:30 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> I find that I now ignore this report since it doesn't indicate the
>> package name. Too many entries to chase down via clicking thru. Not
>> sure of the reason for the change, the old format seems, to me at least,
>> better.
>>
>
> I am, of cours
On 10/10/2011 01:27 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 10/09/2011 10:35 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>
>>The email now says things like:
>>
>> The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13785
>>
>>instead of
>>
>>
On 10/09/2011 10:35 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> The email now says things like:
>
>The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13785
>
> instead of
>
> rpm-4.9.1.2-1.fc15 critical path security update
>
>
>
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 10/09/2011 11:39 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>>
>> Or as intended, because the older reports became less readable due to
>> updates containing N>1 packages. Also see
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-October/103410.
On 10/09/2011 11:39 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Or as intended, because the older reports became less readable due to
> updates containing N>1 packages. Also see
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-October/103410.html
> which sums it up.
Says someone else doesn't like the
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 10:35:43 -0400, GM (Genes) wrote:
>
> The email now says things like:
>
> The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13785
>
> instead of
>
> rpm-4.9.1.2-1.fc15 critical path security update
>
The email now says things like:
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13785
instead of
rpm-4.9.1.2-1.fc15 critical path security update
I'm assuming this is a bug with the script ..
gene
--
test mailing l