perl t/TEST httpd /home/stas/httpd-2.0/bin/httpd -run t/modules/rewrite.t
modules/rewrite.NOK 6Invalid [] range -6 before HERE mark in regex
m/^[!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /modules/rewrite/1 was
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 01:38:49PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
in perl-framework/README:
The test program is always started as t/TEST, which won't work on setups
not having . in the PATH env var
Sure it will. A command containing a / is not evaluated against PATH,
it's relative to the cwd.
On Tuesday 07 August 2001 08:02, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
The problem is that all the tests are being written against 1.3, and
once they all succeed against 1.3, they are being tried against a 2.0
server. Unfortunately, the config files aren't always
it is a range.
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 02:13:35PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
+ perl t/TEST httpd /home/stas/httpd-2.0/bin/httpd -run t/modules/rewrite.t
+ modules/rewrite.NOK 6Invalid [] range -6 before HERE mark in regex
+ m/^[!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
+ htmlhead
+
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, john sachs wrote:
it is a range.
so according to the error:
Invalid [] range -6 before HERE mark in regex
what kind of range -6 is?
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 02:13:35PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
+ perl t/TEST httpd /home/stas/httpd-2.0/bin/httpd -run t/modules/rewrite.t
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Gary Benson wrote:
I've been trying to get httpd-test up and running; could someone please
point me in the direction of the module Apache::BuildConfig?
that is generated by modperl-2.0. it is optional for httpd-test and is
hi,
first let me explain the test a little.
in this section of code, i am testing the 'rnd' rewriting functionality which
takes a text file like this:
1 one|two|three|four|five|six
2 two|three|four|five|six
and rewrites the key randomly to one of the possibilities you've given it. in
the
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Welcome. =-) There are no stupid questions...
That's always nice...
Are you looking for something that does more functional testing or load
testing?
Definitely functional testing at the moment. We have a prototype that
someone wrote several
