On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:21:53 -0700 Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 05:38:30PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: > > > > I think current flood (tried HEAD) have problems with veryfing > > responses. [... cut ...] > I will take a look at this patch and apply in the next few hours. Just a reminder :) [.. cut ..] > > This is what i'm going to work on in near future. > > Thanks! Patches are appreciated, especially if you're also working on > boated webapps. ;) Yeah, but I have to get more familiar with flood source code. There are a few places that IMO need a rethinking. On the other hand -- I might be plain wrong, so let me just play a bit more with the code. > > One more thing... looks like flood build system is slightly broken. > > You can build it, but there's no way to install it in a target > > directory(make install fails). Is this a known problem? > > The install target just hasn't been implemented because at the moment > we only have one file that would need to be installed. If it would be > useful, I'm sure it could be implemented quickly (actually, I was > thinking about this just the other day). Flood needs more testers/developers. This list is too quiet, while [EMAIL PROTECTED] (where I'm lurking) has a lot of people participating. Building a functional beta release will probably help that. Besides flood binary we could install FAQ and example configuration files as documentation. It look's like flood needs (just like every nice system stand-alone binary) a plain man page. I'll try to prepare one, just when get some more free time :) regards, -- Jacek Prucia 7bulls.com S.A. http://www.7bulls.com/
