Re: mod_specweb99 debugging...

2002-08-16 Thread Sander Temme
>> Also - hack the conf to do short runs first ! > > Oh yeah, excellent point. That's the SPEC rc file. Look for *_TIME, > ITERATIONS, and SIMULTANEOUS_CONNECTIONS. My rc files usually have trial (short) values for *_TIME and a single iteration. You can force all those in line for a compliant r

Re: mod_specweb99 debugging...

2002-08-16 Thread Greg Ames
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > SpecWeb right now follows the run book very liberally - and there are > certainly shortcuts you could take whilst staying within the run rules. If > you want to I can dig out a list. It would be great if you could post such a list. Looking at SPECWeb99 dynamic cont

Re: mod_specweb99 debugging...

2002-08-16 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
> * The harder you drive the server, the more disk space you will need. > SPECWeb99 > touches more files as you ramp up the number of concurrent connections. There > is a formula here: > http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/docs/users_guide.html#Pre-Inst > Plus you need disk space for logs proportion

Re: mod_specweb99 debugging...

2002-08-16 Thread Greg Ames
Ian Holsman wrote: > i'm just about to talk to * who are going to do some static specweb > tests with apache2 > any tips you would like to share with them ??? yeah. * When you source the shrc file, don't expect to see any output. It just sets some envvars. * Look at the SPECWeb99 results

Re: mod_specweb99 debugging...

2002-08-16 Thread Greg Ames
Chris Johnson wrote: > > Hi: > I'm using your specweb99 modules to examine apache performance, and was > wondering if you have newer versions handy - I noticed that the 1.3 > version did not compile on rh7.2 > (the SEMCNTR define needed to be disabled); it seemed to work > afterwards. Would you m