Re: mod_specweb99 debugging...

2002-08-19 Thread Greg Ames
Ian Holsman wrote: > > Another area for potential improvement here is the use of file caching. I > > tried > > using mod_cache's fd caching, but quickly ran into problems with the Linux > > per-process fd limits because SPECWeb99 accesses so many different files. > hmm.. did you use a recent

Re: mod_specweb99 debugging...

2002-08-19 Thread Ian Holsman
Greg Ames wrote: Ian Holsman wrote: Thanks... what I was after was more hints on configuring HTTP. ie.. make sure FollowSymLinks is On & AllowOverride off (to avoid unnessecary fileops) and things like this Oh, OK, then http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/misc/perf-tuning.html would be relevant. y

Re: mod_specweb99 debugging...

2002-08-19 Thread Greg Ames
Ian Holsman wrote: > Thanks... > what I was after was more hints on configuring HTTP. > ie.. make sure FollowSymLinks is On & AllowOverride off > (to avoid unnessecary fileops) and things like this Oh, OK, then http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/misc/perf-tuning.html would be relevant. I set up

Re: mod_specweb99 debugging...

2002-08-19 Thread Ian Holsman
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: * The harder you drive the server, the more disk space you will need. SPECWeb99 touches more files as you ramp up the number of concurrent connections. There is a formula here: http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/docs/users_guide.html#Pre-Inst Plus you need disk space for l