Re: [PATCH] Get mod_specweb99 to compile against 2.0.43

2002-10-25 Thread gregames
"MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" wrote: > > I noticed that there were some places where u_int32_t is being used instead > of apr_uint32_t. Is it purposefully done OR is it one of those "Oh, the apr > interface changed" stuff ?. > > Anyways, I've included a patch that atleast gets the mo

Re: [PATCH] Get mod_specweb99 to compile against 2.0.43

2002-10-24 Thread Sander Temme
> I noticed that there were some places where u_int32_t is being used instead > of apr_uint32_t. Is it purposefully done OR is it one of those "Oh, the apr > interface changed" stuff ?. > > Anyways, I've included a patch that atleast gets the module to compile > against 2.0.43. Pl. let me know if

[PATCH] Get mod_specweb99 to compile against 2.0.43

2002-10-21 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
I noticed that there were some places where u_int32_t is being used instead of apr_uint32_t. Is it purposefully done OR is it one of those "Oh, the apr interface changed" stuff ?. Anyways, I've included a patch that atleast gets the module to compile against 2.0.43. Pl. let me know if it's okay.