On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 07:44:02AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jerenkrantz01/08/17 00:44:02
>
> Modified:floodconfig.h.in configure.in flood.c
> flood_round_robin.c
> Log:
> - Clean up debugging info when using delays.
> - Fix error where a url wou
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 08:30:20AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 07:44:02AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > jerenkrantz01/08/17 00:44:02
> >
> > Modified:floodconfig.h.in configure.in flood.c
> > flood_round_robin.c
> > Log:
> >
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 08:30:20AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > Index: config.h.in
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-test/flood/config.h.in,v
> > retrieving revision 1.13
> > retrieving revision 1.14
> > diff -u -r1.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:00:53AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> Let me be more clear here. I'd prefer if we did the check for
> 'rand' 'rand48' 'random' (and possibly also /dev/urandom) and
> set each of FLOOD_HAS_RAND* individually. This is the way you are
> using it in the code, where you have s
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:02:01AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 08:30:20AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > > Index: config.h.in
> > > ===
> > > RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-test/flood/config.h.in,v
> > >
[ CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED] - this came about due to flood requiring a PRNG... ]
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:21:06AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> Really this should be in APR, but I fear that PRNG is a touchy subject
> for portability. The problem is that when you're using a PRNG, you usually
> need
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:19:26AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:00:53AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > Let me be more clear here. I'd prefer if we did the check for
> > 'rand' 'rand48' 'random' (and possibly also /dev/urandom) and
> > set each of FLOOD_HAS_RAND* ind
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:34:28AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> This is all really NBD, I'm just pointing out that by what you were doing
> in code should have been done with USE instead of HAS, and that it would
> be no big deal to add HAS and USE.
Please check the code again - it is using USE.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 11:15:34AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:34:28AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > This is all really NBD, I'm just pointing out that by what you were doing
> > in code should have been done with USE instead of HAS, and that it would
> > be no bi
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:30:24AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> [ CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED] - this came about due to flood requiring a PRNG... ]
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 09:21:06AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > Really this should be in APR, but I fear that PRNG is a touchy subject
> > for
> > I don't see a problem adding a PRNG into APR as long as we have a by
> > default "good" one available with known characteristics. -- justin
>
> Um... APR *already* has random stuff in there. It can build against the
> truerand library, and it can use the /dev/random device.
>
> If we have a
11 matches
Mail list logo
