> so yeah, it sucks, continues to suck, and I'm sorry.
ok, I went through and changed all of the ones I saw that needed changing.
all tests are fine for me except the ones for modules I don't have installed
(namely ssl and php). sorry if I broke any of those...
--Geoff
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:26 AM +0100 Joe Orton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yup, the t_cmp arguments were flipped a while back.
>
>
> FWIW, I think whomever flipped the t_cmp arguments but didn't flip the
> included test cases at the same time needs
--On Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:26 AM +0100 Joe Orton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yup, the t_cmp arguments were flipped a while back.
FWIW, I think whomever flipped the t_cmp arguments but didn't flip the
included test cases at the same time needs a stern talking to. I spent
over an hour
--On Wednesday, September 29, 2004 3:39 PM +0100 Joe Orton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, the difference is in the handling of an empty Content-Length header.
The glibc strtoll does not return an error for an empty string, as C99
requires, and so ap_http_filter treats it exactly as "Content-Lengt
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:26:05AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:53:42AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > jerenkrantz2004/09/28 23:53:42
> >
> > Modified:perl-framework/c-modules/nntp_like mod_nntp_like.c
> >perl-framework/t/apache contentlength.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:53:42AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jerenkrantz2004/09/28 23:53:42
>
> Modified:perl-framework/c-modules/nntp_like mod_nntp_like.c
>perl-framework/t/apache contentlength.t
>perl-framework/t/protocol nntp-like.t
> Log:
>
