[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Just rm -rf it - it is a new import anyway.
>
> Dw
OK, you & Justin talked me into it. The structure looks much simpler in ViewCVS
now.
Greg
Just rm -rf it - it is a new import anyway.
Dw
--
Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Greg Ames wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > gregames02/05/02 10:20:10
> >
> > Log:
> > Initial revision
> >
> > Status:
> >
> > Vendor Tag: init
> > Release Tags: start
> >
> >
Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 May 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > Since this is brand new, you could always blow away the directories on
> > icarus. Your call. AIUI, if you do the "cvs rm" approach, when you
> > re-add, this version will come back out of the attic. -- justin
>
> Rig
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Since this is brand new, you could always blow away the directories on
> icarus. Your call. AIUI, if you do the "cvs rm" approach, when you
> re-add, this version will come back out of the attic. -- justin
Right. rm the ,v files. But it's really
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 02:57:22PM -0400, Greg Ames wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> yuck. "cvs import" created a branch, 4 digit revision numbers, and a couple
> of
> useless tags. I'd like to blow this away and try again with cvs add. Is rm,
> cvs remove, cvs commit on all files the best w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> gregames02/05/02 10:20:10
>
> Log:
> Initial revision
>
> Status:
>
> Vendor Tag: init
> Release Tags: start
>
> N httpd-test/specweb99/httpd.specweb.conf
> N httpd-test/specweb99/LICENSE.txt
> N httpd-test/specweb99/rc.byrd_ap
> N httpd-tes
