On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 07:45:17 -0700
Guy Ferraiolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great. I have a need for non-numeric random substitution and I
don't want to do something contradictory.
I was hoping for a few days dedicated to flood development, but I had to
settle for a few hours. Somehow I
Is this in the source archive now?
Thanks!
Guy
-Original Message-
From: Jacek Prucia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed range for random variables
Really nifty flood feature is the ability to initialize variable
(calls random...) 27667 articles handy. So we need fixed
range for random variables, which is what I have already written. The
problem is how we integrate this into flood.
Right now the range can be specified as:
5:24
-12:79
:41 (means 0:41)
123: (means 123:RAND_MAX)
Natural choice
A friend has suggested that you might want to consider
allowing ${name=rand(41)} as a construct similar to :41?
Guy
-Original Message-
From: Jacek Prucia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed range for random variables
