Re: flood proxy (was: [STATUS] (flood))

2003-03-15 Thread Jacek Prucia
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 07:15:07 -0800 Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 01:46 AM, Jacek Prucia wrote: [...] > > Wouldn't it be better, if we use proxy instead of all-purpose network > > software? I was thinking about mod_proxy_flood.so with some function > >

Re: flood proxy (was: [STATUS] (flood))

2003-03-15 Thread Jacek Prucia
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 06:34:37 -0800 Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > It would be cool if we could extend mod_proxy, but if this is impossible > > (because of some technical issues I'm not aware of) we might do our own > > thing. Writting a small, customized proxy in C/APR, Per

Re: flood proxy (was: [STATUS] (flood))

2003-03-13 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 01:46 AM, Jacek Prucia wrote: * Write robust tool (using tethereal perhaps) to take network dumps and convert them to flood's XML format. Status: Justin volunteers. Aaron had a script somewhere that is a start. Wouldn't it be bet

Re: flood proxy (was: [STATUS] (flood))

2003-03-13 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:46 AM +0100 Jacek Prucia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wouldn't it be better, if we use proxy instead of all-purpose network software? I was thinking about mod_proxy_flood.so with some function attached to request forwarding and a simple response handler which could

flood proxy (was: [STATUS] (flood))

2003-03-13 Thread Jacek Prucia
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:45:47 -0500 Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > flood STATUS: -*-text-*- > Last modified at [$Date: 2002/09/06 10:24:42 $] [...] > * Write robust tool (using tethereal perhaps) to take network dumps >