[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2003/01/30 16:53:45
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm
Log:
# handle the cases when the test suite is run under 'root':
#
# 1. When user 'bar' is chosen to run Apache with, files and dirs
#created by 'root' might be not
http://httpd.apache.org/test/ points to http://www.apachelabs.org/test-dev/
for the mail archives, which gets redirected to http://www.apache.org/.
If the archive has moved where is the new location? In any case that link
should be fixed/removed.
Here is another archive:
http://marc.theaimsgrou
Stas Bekman wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/test/ points to
http://www.apachelabs.org/test-dev/ for the mail archives, which gets
redirected to http://www.apache.org/.
If the archive has moved where is the new location? In any case that
link should be fixed/removed.
Here is another archive:
htt
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > stas2003/01/30 16:53:45
> >
> > Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm
> > Log:
> > # handle the cases when the test suite is run under 'root':
> > #
> > # 1. When user 'bar' is chosen
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2003/01/30 16:53:45
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm
Log:
# handle the cases when the test suite is run under 'root':
#
# 1. When user 'bar' is chosen to run Apache wit
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Is the whole test-under-'root' issue moot under win32, and can
> be safely skipped without messing the code?
Hi Stas,
There is a concept of permissions under Win32 (some flavours)
which in principle can enter this (for example, an Administrator
can bloc
Hi all,
I'm seeing a problem in the Windows build of flood with Makefile.win.
The makefile generates a batch file that sets up various variables.
In the command block of some targets, we call the batch file before
invoking a tool like nmake, MSDEV, etc. For example:
floodenv.bat
msdev flo
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Is the whole test-under-'root' issue moot under win32, and can
be safely skipped without messing the code?
Hi Stas,
There is a concept of permissions under Win32 (some flavours)
which in principle can enter this (for example, an Adminis
