Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm

2003-01-31 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stas2003/01/30 16:53:45 Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm Log: # handle the cases when the test suite is run under 'root': # # 1. When user 'bar' is chosen to run Apache with, files and dirs #created by 'root' might be

what happened to http://www.apachelabs.org/test-dev/

2003-01-31 Thread Stas Bekman
http://httpd.apache.org/test/ points to http://www.apachelabs.org/test-dev/ for the mail archives, which gets redirected to http://www.apache.org/. If the archive has moved where is the new location? In any case that link should be fixed/removed. Here is another archive:

Re: what happened to http://www.apachelabs.org/test-dev/

2003-01-31 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/test/ points to http://www.apachelabs.org/test-dev/ for the mail archives, which gets redirected to http://www.apache.org/. If the archive has moved where is the new location? In any case that link should be fixed/removed. Here is another archive:

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm

2003-01-31 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stas2003/01/30 16:53:45 Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm Log: # handle the cases when the test suite is run under 'root': # # 1. When user 'bar' is chosen to run Apache

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm

2003-01-31 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stas2003/01/30 16:53:45 Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm Log: # handle the cases when the test suite is run under 'root': # # 1. When user 'bar' is chosen to run Apache

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestRun.pm

2003-01-31 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Is the whole test-under-'root' issue moot under win32, and can be safely skipped without messing the code? Hi Stas, There is a concept of permissions under Win32 (some flavours) which in principle can enter this (for example, an Administrator can block