It's not the prettiest thing in the world, but it works... :-)
http://handelframework.com/source/trunk/Makefile.PL
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>> skip the tests entirely unless Apache::Test is 1.27? something akin
>> to this
>> ought to do the trick...
>>
>> http://search.cpan.org/src/GEOFF/Apache-Clean-0.05/Makefile.PL
>>
>> --Geoff
>>
>>
>
> That doesn't make a lot of sense in
Geoffrey Young wrote:
skip the tests entirely unless Apache::Test is 1.27? something akin to this
ought to do the trick...
http://search.cpan.org/src/GEOFF/Apache-Clean-0.05/Makefile.PL
--Geoff
That doesn't make a lot of sense in my case. Skipping ~20 test files
when only ~4 of those re
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>>> Hey, why wait until I get home. See attached patch: TestMM.pm.patch.
>>
>>
>>
>> thanks. applied, tested, committed.
>>
>> --Geoff
>>
>>
> So, with that in hand, how do I deal with the present, before 1.27?
skip the tests entirely unless
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Hey, why wait until I get home. See attached patch: TestMM.pm.patch.
thanks. applied, tested, committed.
--Geoff
So, with that in hand, how do I deal with the present, before 1.27?
I think I can just make my own Apache::TestMM::test in my Makefile.PL
after I load T
> Hey, why wait until I get home. See attached patch: TestMM.pm.patch.
thanks. applied, tested, committed.
--Geoff
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Unless there's some reason that TestMM is deliberatly ignoring the
test=>TESTS option,
none that I can think of
I'll patch it this evening and send that to the list.
excellent.
--Geoff
Hey, why wait until I get home. See attached patch: TestMM.pm.patch.
All th
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>
>> Unless there's some reason that TestMM is deliberatly ignoring the
>> test=>TESTS option, I'll patch it this evening and send that to the list.
>>
>> -=Chris
>
>
> Anoyher option, or something in addition to changing TestMM::test wou
> Unless there's some reason that TestMM is deliberatly ignoring the
> test=>TESTS option,
none that I can think of
> I'll patch it this evening and send that to the list.
excellent.
--Geoff
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Unless there's some reason that TestMM is deliberatly ignoring the
test=>TESTS option, I'll patch it this evening and send that to the list.
-=Chris
Anoyher option, or something in addition to changing TestMM::test would
be to add a norecurse option to TestRun. If
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Hey, there's the empty TEST_FILES in TestMM::test. :-/
So, is this a bug, a feature, and oversite?
hmm...
well, I use TEST_FILES all the time
$ make test TEST_FILES=t/Foo TEST_VERBOSE=1
and it works just fine. the crux of this very long message is that TESTS in
Mak
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> I have a fun problem with Apache-Test and the EU::MM test=>TESTS option.
> Long story longer.
>
> I recently added t/*.t tests to test my Catalyst helper modules. These
> tests call the helpers modules, which in turn cause Catalyst to create
> files (modules, tests,
I have a fun problem with Apache-Test and the EU::MM test=>TESTS option.
Long story longer.
I recently added t/*.t tests to test my Catalyst helper modules. These
tests call the helpers modules, which in turn cause Catalyst to create
files (modules, tests, templates) in t/TestApp. Some of thes
13 matches
Mail list logo