new dvips

2002-11-27 Thread Kalyan Mukherjea
Hi Dmitri, Fromwhere did you download the files? Thomas had sent me the url: http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/dvips5.92a/ On that page there are 3 links: to Thomas's web page (Parent directory) a dvips*.tar.gz file which contains the necessary run time files; and _dvips_ which is a

Re: new dvips

2002-11-27 Thread George White
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Kalyan Mukherjea wrote: Hi Dmitri, Fromwhere did you download the files? Thomas had sent me the url: http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/dvips5.92a/ On that page there are 3 links: to Thomas's web page (Parent directory) a dvips*.tar.gz file which contains the

Re: new dvips

2002-11-27 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Kalyan Mukherjea wrote: Hi Dmitri, Fromwhere did you download the files? Thomas had sent me the url: http://www.dbs.uni-hannover.de/~te/dvips5.92a/ On that page there are 3 links: to Thomas's web page (Parent directory) a dvips*.tar.gz file which contains the necessary run time files; and

Re: new dvips

2002-11-27 Thread Dimitri Antoniou
? It means that -G1 (as set e.g. via -Ppdf) does no longer produce incorrect output. The remapping of characters works for computer modern, but it does not work for a lot of other fonts. The new dvips decides on a per-font basis whether

new dvips

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitri Antoniou
Hi, I downloaded and compiled version 5.92 of dvips. When we say that the character shifting issue has been corrected, do we mean that dvips -Ppdf ... without either -G or -G0, now works for computer modern, adobe postscript, and combinations of them? Is that right? Dimitri

Re: new dvips

2002-10-31 Thread Thomas Esser
incorrect output. The remapping of characters works for computer modern, but it does not work for a lot of other fonts. The new dvips decides on a per-font basis whether to remap it or not and it only remaps if that won't mess up the result. Thomas