Re: 20020901 pretest

Hi Thomas, please forget my mail. The libkpathsea so-name comes from a Debian-specific patch I forgot to apply when building my private package... Sorry Adrian On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > I built Debian packages of 20020901 for my private use and I w

Re: 20020901 pretest

Hi Thomas, my personal wishlist of packages I'd like to see included in teTeX: - eurosym (own licence that seems to qualify as free) - extsizes (LPPL) TIA Adrian -- You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a pol

Re: 20020901 pretest

Hi Thomas, I built Debian packages of 20020901 for my private use and I was pretty surprised that libkpathsea lost it's so-name (there's no longer a libkpathsea.so.3). This breaks software that was linked with libkpathsea.3 and looking at any other shared library I know this seems to be wrong. c

Re: [patch] texconfig with whiptail instead of dialog

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Thomas Esser wrote: > > The patch to implement this is simple: > > > > --- tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202.orig/texk/tetex/texconfig > > +++ tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202/texk/tetex/texconfig > > @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ > >{ u=`uname -s`; } 2>/dev/null > >case "$u" in > > FreeBSD

Problem with t1lib in the latest teTeX beta

Hi Thomas, Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reported the problem below in the copy of t1lib the latest teTeX beta ships on architectures where char is unsigned (e.g. arm, powerpc or s390). Compile time warning: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -g -O2 -DT1LIB_IDENT="\"1.2\"" -DGLOBAL_C

[patch] texconfig with whiptail instead of dialog

Hi Thomas, YAMASHITA Junji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> suggested that texconfig should be able to work automatically with whiptail when dialog isn't available. Package: whiptail Description: Displays user-friendly dialog boxes from shell scripts. whiptail is a "dialog" replacement using newt instead of

Re: teTeX 20011202 beta remarks

On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Gerben Wierda wrote: > - nehyph2.tex is missing from the 20011202 beta >... It was removed because it's non-free. Use nehyph.tex instead. cu Adrian -- Get my GPG key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gpg --import Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400

[patch] mpto isn't correctly in the latest teTeX beta

Hi Thomas, hi Olaf, I don't know whether the following problem is already known: texk/web2c/mpware/ChangeLog says: 2001-10-26 Olaf Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Makefile.in (mpto): Now links with libkpathsea. ... This change means that you do now use klibtool to build mpto. The prob

Re: 2001/12/02 pretest

On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Thomas Esser wrote: > Hi, Hi Thomas, > I just have uploaded > teTeX-src-beta-20011202.tar.gz >... I've found more bugs: 1. texk/tetex/fdf2tan doesn't has an interpreter line at the beginning. 2. texk/web2c/pdftexdir/Makefile isn't removed by "make distclean". 3. The se

Re: 2001/12/02 pretest

On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Thomas Esser wrote: > Hi, Hi Thomas, > I just have uploaded > teTeX-src-beta-20011202.tar.gz >... "--with-system-t1lib" doesn't work, too. From config.log: <-- snip --> configure:3749: gcc -o conftest -g -O2conftest.c -lt1 -lz -lm 1>&5 /tmp/ccMC3xZl.o: In functio

Re: 2001/12/02 pretest

On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Thomas Esser wrote: > Hi, Hi Thomas, > I just have uploaded > teTeX-src-beta-20011202.tar.gz >... compilation fails when configured with "--with-system-wwwlib": <-- snip --> ... ./squeeze t-hps.pro mv t-hps.pro hps.pro make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/teTeX-src-beta-2

Re: 2001/12/02 pretest

On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Thomas Esser wrote: > Hi, Hi Thomas, >... > pretest and a bugfix for dvips. The texmf and texmfsrc tarballs have > been updated for a few packages (hyperref, pdftex.def, cite). >... The update of the cite package made three *.sty files in tex/latex/cite/ mode 775 instead of

Re: finally: new texmf tarball (beta-20011128)

On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Thomas Esser wrote: > Hi, Hi Thomas, > Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date > I think (please let me know about any outdated/wrong stuff in it). >... some things I noticed while packaging for Debian: - doc/help/Catalogue/entries/psnfss.h

[patch] Display a preferences menu in texconfig

Hi Thomas, Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> suggested the following patch to display a preferences menu in texconfig: --- texconfig.orig Mon Sep 10 20:25:49 2001 +++ texconfig Mon Sep 10 20:27:30 2001 @@ -1773,6 +1773,7 @@ " 23 80 12 \ "EXIT" 'exit' \ "CONF" 'show con

Problem compiling teTeX on IA-64

Hi, Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reported the following problem with the 20001218 beta of teTeX: <-- snip -> The configure script in the texk/kpathsea directory seg faults when running the test program that checks whether putenv uses malloc. The problem is that the test program doesn't

Re: [tex-k] secure mode of dvips should be default

On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > Alan Shutko writes: > > > Yeah, but people don't distribute .dvi files, do they? > > > > Sure they do. There are DVI docs distributed with many binary > > distributions of tetex, the Emacs manual is being distributed to > > proofreaders in DVI, a

Bug#94699: tetex-bin: PATCH: gcc 3.0 issues, Build failure on PARISCmachines (fwd)

Hi Thomas, the following mail was sent to the bug tracking system of Debian GNU/Linux. (in Debian unstable there's the Linux/hppa architecture which uses a gcc 3.0 snapshot to compile their packages) cu Adrian -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 01:44:18 -0600 (MDT)