ion?
It doesn't make sense to do that. ptex is too special -- it isn't a
`dvips+CJK', it is a `dvips+Japanese' only, AFAIK.
Werner
> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 11:36:45 +0200
> From: "Giuseppe Ghibo'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [tex-k] secure mode of dvips should be default
>
> Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
Paul Vojta wrote:
o...
> >
> > Chinese Japanese extensions
>
> Yes, I can guess that much. But, specifically what is it about dvips
> that requires patches to make it work with CJK?
See for instance here:
ftp://ftp.ascii.co.jp/pub/TeX/ascii-ptex/dvips/
Giuseppe Ghibo' writes:
> See for instance here:
>
> ftp://ftp.ascii.co.jp/pub/TeX/ascii-ptex/dvips/
>
have you looked at it, Giuseppe? Is there any reason why the patches
cannot be merged into the normal distribution?
Sebastian
