> Well ConTeXt is outdated:
After sume discussion with Hans, he has rearranged the files below
texmf/pdftex a little. Now, I have added updated ConTeXt to v2001/12/20 (beta).
Thomas
> Other people probably install a new version over an old one and all
> configuration files are overwritten. At least texmf.cnf has an
> interesting feature:
>
> % original texmf.cnf -- runtime path configuration file for kpathsea.
> % (If you change or delete `original' on the previous line, the
Hi Thomas,
I hope that you're on schedule with the thesis etc.
> > But I admit that it is a bit difficult (Hans Hagen changed the ISP and
> > was not yet able to move the DNS over to the new provider). The official
>
>Yes, I have downloaded from the wrong site. Oh, if only CTAN was really
>*comp
> > Current is 2001.11.13, 13.14
> > You have
> > 2001.7.11, 16.33
>
> can you explain what "13.14" and "16.33" mean? is there some sort
> of versioning here?
It is 2001.11.13.13.14 on Hans' server.
My interpretation is
.MM.DD.HH.MM
> in which case why does it go backwards?
:-)
Thomas
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 07:14:56PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Well ConTeXt is outdated:
> Current is 2001.11.13, 13.14
> You have
> 2001.7.11, 16.33
can you explain what "13.14" and "16.33" mean? is there some sort
of versioning here? in which case why does it go backwards?
I have always wi
Hi,
> Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date
> I think (please let me know about any outdated/wrong stuff in it).
Well ConTeXt is outdated:
Current is 2001.11.13, 13.14
You have
2001.7.11, 16.33
But I admit that it is a bit difficult (Hans Hagen changed the ISP
> But I admit that it is a bit difficult (Hans Hagen changed the ISP and
> was not yet able to move the DNS over to the new provider). The official
Yes, I have downloaded from the wrong site. Oh, if only CTAN was really
*comprehensive*...
> page is: http://ds035.xs4all.nl/download.htm
Ok, I jus
> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adrian> dvips/config/config.ps is that dvips sends generated .ps
Adrian> files directly to the printer
I don't see anything wrong with that, it is a reasonable default
behaviour. Whereas generating a .ps file has no reasonable defa
> > Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date
> > I think (please let me know about any outdated/wrong stuff in it).
>
> Is cm-super included?
No. But I have not yet finally decided about including it in future.
Thomas
On 2001-11-29 18:00:23 +0100, Thomas Esser wrote:
> Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date
> I think (please let me know about any outdated/wrong stuff in it).
Is cm-super included?
Best regards
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/200
> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - [not really new] it's often annoying that the
> default in dvips/config/config.ps is that dvips sends generated
> .ps files directly to the printer
I agree, but this has been discussed on this list some years ago and
most
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 18:00:23 +0100
> From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: finally: new texmf tarball (beta-20011128)
>
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date
> I think (plea
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Thomas Esser wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Thomas,
> Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date
> I think (please let me know about any outdated/wrong stuff in it).
>...
some things I noticed while packaging for Debian:
- doc/help/Catalogue/entries/psnfss.h
On 29 Nov, Thomas Esser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date
> I think (please let me know about any outdated/wrong stuff in it).
>
> One important feature is that it is does not contain any known non-free
> software.
>
> You can get the new t
> I noticed later ones of hyperref and pdftex.def are in tug:
> hyperref: 6.71v > 6.71m
> pdftex.def : [2001/09/01 v0.03h] > [2001/05/25 v0.03g]
Ah, yes, thanks. I just have updated these two and pdftex.def was just
updated yesterday :-)
pdftex.def [2001/11/29 v0.03i]
Thomas
From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: finally: new texmf tarball (beta-20011128)
> Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date
> I think (please let me know about any outdated/wrong stuff in it).
Thanks.
I noticed later ones of hyperref and pd
Hi,
Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date
I think (please let me know about any outdated/wrong stuff in it).
One important feature is that it is does not contain any known non-free
software.
You can get the new texmf tarball at CTAN:systems/unix/teTeX-beta, e.g
17 matches
Mail list logo
