2017-08-20 16:03 GMT+02:00 Bob Tennent :
> Hi all. Could someone explain what \upzst is intended
> to mean? Surely not staccato *and* tenuto, which is a
> contradiction.
Mezzo-staccato, also called portato.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portato
---
TeX-music@tug.org ma
I wrote
>... Some day I may introduce some PMX logic to get around this
> restriction in cases like this, but for now I suggest simply using inline
TeX to
> emplace the dot with \upz, or the tenuto with \lst...
Of course I should have written \ust .
--Don
---
TeX-mus
It's been interesting and a little frustrating looking into the 4 "features"
Andre identified. Most of the frustration is from a combination of my fading
memory and insufficient commenting in the PMX code, making it very difficult
to reconstruct PMX's internal logic. But here's where I stand on the
I had already figured out that using \upz and \ust would remove the
restriction. But as it now stands, PMX assumes that when these ornaments are
used on single, up-beamed notes, by default they go below the notehead, so
it uses \lpz, \lst. I was hoping to address this "feature" without
reprogrammin
Hi all. Could someone explain what \upzst is intended
to mean? Surely not staccato *and* tenuto, which is a
contradiction. On a string instrument pizzicato-tenuto
makes sense: pluck the string and then hold the note: i.e.,
pizzicato which is *not* staccato. But on other kinds of
instrument? On a ha
>|Here is a simple workaround:
>|
>|\Notes\ibu1h2\ust o\upz n\qb1h\ust p\upz o\qb1i%
>|\ust q\upz p\tbu1\qb1j\ibu1k2\ust r\upz q\qb1k%
>|\ust s\upz r\qb1l\ust t\upz s\tbu1\qb1m\en%
Even better is to use \upzst:
\Notes\ibu1h2\upzst n\qb1h\upzst o\qb1i%
\upzst p\tbu1\qb1j\ibu1k2\upzst q\qb1k%
>|Andre has provided an example that highlights the
>|following "feature": If you try to put \lpz or \lst above
>|the staff, you are restricted to every other vertical
>|position. The same is not true of \upz or \ust.
The \lpz and \lst are there, but the former are masked by
the latter, whose
7 matches
Mail list logo