Rodolfo Medina writes:
> Bob Tennent writes:
>
>> >| it's a bit depressing to see how little is in percentage
>> >| the presence of MusiXTeX/pmx sources in IMSLP
>>
>> Lots of scores at IMSLP were produced using MusiXTeX, but
>> the contributors haven't bothered to submit their "engraving
>> f
On 4/20/19 12:05 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Dieter writes:
Thank you... It'd be great. I'll try to install Audiveris in my Linux
machine. If successful, I'll then start the happy `xml -> tex' walk. I'll let
you know.
I managed to build and run audiveris on my Mint 18.3 linux station. I
fo
>|Rodolfo Medina writes:
>|
>|I'd propose that a specific repository be created, including all and
>|only music
>|score sources...
Why would that make a difference?
Who would set up and manage this repository? Are you
volunteering?
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing
Bob Tennent writes:
> >|Rodolfo Medina writes:
> >|
> >|I'd propose that a specific repository be created, including all and
> >|only music
> >|score sources...
>
> Why would that make a difference?
The difference is that a source file can be easily converted into MusiXTeX
format and so e
On 20.04.2019 13:38 Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> The difference is that a source file can be easily converted into MusiXTeX
> format and so edited at pleasure; a PDF final output can't, or it can but with
> much more difficulty.
As Christian Mondrup already wrote it would be
>|Bob Tennent writes:
>|
>|> >|Rodolfo Medina writes:
>|> >|
>|> >|I'd propose that a specific repository be created,
>|> >|including all and only music score sources...
>|>
>|> Why would that make a difference?
>|
>|The difference is that a source file can be easily
>|converted in
Dieter writes:
> For all people in need of a PMX-version of existing note sheets (of e.g.
> the Bach two voice inventions) I have a tool since 2015: "XML2PMX".
> Please find attached the 1st invention (BWV 772) in terms of MusicXML,
> PMX and PDF.
> There are three steps:
> (1) Scan the original
Hi Rodolfo,
I believe you are working with Linux, right? Did you have a look at the
README file?
There should be 5 entries in the command line. Like this one:
./XML2PMX ./XML/Telemann.xml ./PMX/Telemann.pmx n 10
The option "n" means no option chosen. And "10" is the number of bars you want
to
Hi Christian,
could you please send me your XML file or even better pdf file of Anna
Magdalena's Musette?
Then I will run it through my machinery and we can count the errors.
Regards, Dieter
Am 20.04.2019 um 11:35 schrieb Christian Mondrup:
On 4/20/19 12:05 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Dieter
>| >|Rodolfo Medina writes:
>| >|
>| >|I'd propose that a specific repository be created,
>| >|including all and only music score sources...
Instead of duplicating IMSLP, for no evident benefit, I
suggest that authors can send sources for M-Tx, PMX, autosp
or MusiXTeX processing to me for inc
Dieter writes:
> Hi Rodolfo,
>
> I believe you are working with Linux, right? Did you have a look at the
> README file?
>
> There should be 5 entries in the command line. Like this one:
>
> ./XML2PMX ./XML/Telemann.xml ./PMX/Telemann.pmx n 10
>
> The option "n" means no option chosen. And "10" is
Bob Tennent wrote
...
> Instead of duplicating IMSLP, for no evident benefit, I suggest that
authors
> can send sources for M-Tx, PMX, autosp or MusiXTeX processing to me for
> inclusion in "contrib"
> sub-directories of subsequent CTAN releases of those packages. They will
> then be incorporated i
"Don Simons" writes:
> Bob Tennent wrote
> ...
>> Instead of duplicating IMSLP, for no evident benefit, I suggest that
> authors
>> can send sources for M-Tx, PMX, autosp or MusiXTeX processing to me for
>> inclusion in "contrib"
>> sub-directories of subsequent CTAN releases of those packages. T
On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 6:39 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
>
> I personally believe in, and wish here to remark, the importance of a
> specific
> common time-growing patrimony of MusiXTeX sources, along with IMSLP or
> aside...
> But maybe aside...
I agree that a section of sources would be very use
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> "Don Simons" writes:
>
>> Bob Tennent wrote
>> ...
>>> Instead of duplicating IMSLP, for no evident benefit, I suggest that
>> authors
>>> can send sources for M-Tx, PMX, autosp or MusiXTeX processing to me for
>>> inclusion in "contrib"
>>> sub-directories of subsequent
Hi Rodolfo,
"fi invalid" means that the input xml-file does not exist.
Could you send me the whole input command?
I am just unable to test, because my linux-ubuntu machine is not working
properly (mousepointer shivering),
I must get a new mouse and keyboard early next week.
Regards, Dieter
A
maurizio .mau. codogno wrote
>I agree that a section of sources would be very useful: as many have said,
> it is easier not to start from scratch if you want to edit a piece of sheet
> music.
>(I would even accept abc sources!) But I also >think that it would be better
>to
>have it as a side
Dieter writes:
> Hi Rodolfo,
>
> "fi invalid" means that the input xml-file does not exist.
> Could you send me the whole input command?
>
> I am just unable to test, because my linux-ubuntu machine is not working
> properly (mousepointer shivering),
> I must get a new mouse and keyboard early n
"Don Simons" writes:
> maurizio .mau. codogno wrote
>
>>I agree that a section of sources would be very useful: as many have said,
>> it is easier not to start from scratch if you want to edit a piece of sheet
>> music.
>>(I would even accept abc sources!) But I also >think that it would be be
19 matches
Mail list logo