On Friday, January 5, 2007 at 3:26:53 PM, you wrote:
> Yes you are right. There is a version of musixtex installed 'within' the
> miktex directory structure. If you are a pure musixtex user that's
> helpfull.
> If you - like I - use mtx / pmx / musistex it's not that easy any more.
> The installa
s going to have to do the pioneering work of
figuring out how to get MusixTeX with all its Type1 font goodies to
work on MikTeX 2.5...
A happy new MusixTeX-ing year to everyone!
Eva-Raphaela Jaksch
___
TeX-music mailing list
TeX-music@icking-music-a
here's a connection to the Palatino issue.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. If I can't sort this within the
next couple of days, I'm going to trash MikTeX 2.5 and revert to
2.1.8, because at least I know how to make that one work and I
suddenly find myself in somewh
On Thursday, November 16, 2006 at 1:17:55 PM, David Allsopp wrote:
> The MiKTeX Repository package for MusiXTeX (2.5 or 2.4) still doesn't
> include musixflx.exe making it essentially broken. I too am still waiting
> for MiKTeX 2.5 to become a little more stable before updating (so sticking
> with
usixTeX purposes, or whether it still makes a
difference at all?
Thanks in advance!
Eva-Raphaela Jaksch
___
TeX-music mailing list
TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org
http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
5 matches
Mail list logo
