On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:30 -0700, Don Simons wrote:
Can anyone explain why the following file, (snip)
Lacking the knowledge to do anything *really* helpful, I did my
routine chop chop exercise on the generated tex source. I append a
reduced source file that still shows more leading space on
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 08:39 +0200, Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Terrence Enger wrote:
(snip)
(snip)
Sorry for the lng demo file, but please search 'myossia' in it.
Thank you.
I think I shall punt on the question for now, and just hard-code two
particular numbers
Greetings,
Can anybody tell me if I am doing something wrong here? The first
note in the cello part has both flags and a beam.
I shall append the source and attach the resulting .dvi file. I have
reduced the source to the point where removing any of lots of things
makes the problem of
Greetings,
Things were going too smoothly, so I had to try to get subtle, and
here I am, back bothering the list for help again. Sigh.
I have seen Rainer Dunker's example of ossia processing at
http://www.mail-archive.com/tex-music@sunsite.dk/msg00532.html, and
I tried to follow it for making
Thank you. That makes sense.
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
Greetings,
( Now that I have written this down, it is obvious that I need to code
the \Tocfin1 one note earlier. Still, my question stands with respect
to inline TeX in general. )
Early in my attempts to use inline TeX within a pmx file, I have found
something which surprises me as funny: pmx
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 23:19 -0700, Don Simons wrote:
I wrote
Someone did work out the ossia and it might be in Cornelius Noack's tips
and tricks. If not and if no one else provides a link, let me know and I'll
ferret it out. It wasn't easy to do...lots of inline TeX required.
It's in the
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 13:26 -0700, Don Simons wrote:
?? Unless I'm missing something, I can't see anything unexpected, nor why you
would expect both to be the same. In Ex 1 the tie on the e curves down by
default and the one on c curves up as you coded. Down-ties start below center
and go
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 08:30 -0700, Don Simons wrote:
Terry--
Someone did work out the ossia and it might be in Cornelius Noack's tips
and tricks. If not and if no one else provides a link, let me know and I'll
ferret it out. It wasn't easy to do...lots of inline TeX required.
I do not see
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 15:30 +0200, Cornelius C. Noack wrote:
(cut)
This is even more so, as the solution of the problm is to make use
of the appropriate PMX method for that: tweaking the position/length
of D (and, in fact, all other cases of the D command!) accordingly;
in your case, the
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 06:46 -0400, Bob Tennent wrote:
|On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Bob Tennent wrote:
|
| If you already have a musixtex score and don't want to start again using
| pmx, you can suppress instruments as follows: [...]
|
|Could you please provide an example with 3 or 4
Sorry this crossed in the mail with Jean-Pierr Coulon asking the same
question and Bob Tennent answering it.
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:32 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
Neat; it works!
But what would you change to print one of the other three parts instead?
(Yes, I am treating this as a magic
Greetings,
I know from Noack Typsetting music with PMX -- version 2.6 that
I am not supposed to put the code for a dynamic mark in front of a
note. Still, a segmentation fault seems like an overly severe punishment
for a coding error.
I append the PMX souce and the console output (lightly
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 08:23 -0700, Don Simons wrote:
Terry--
As the developer of PMX, I'm always curious to know why anyone would prefer
using raw MusiXTeX. I can only speculate that it is either because you are
unaware of PMX, or because PMX lacks some feature that cannot be handled
within
14 matches
Mail list logo
