>|One such situation would be where there is a single
>|instrument with multiple staves, once of which
>|has a normal treble clef and another an octave
>|treble clef. I cannot see how to get MusiXTeX to
>|do this, because in the clef substitution command
>|\settrebleclefsymbol[n]\treblelowoct
2018-05-21 22:58 GMT+02:00 Bob Tennent :
> >|Is there a repository anywhere of at least all the Taupin releases?
>
> http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/
> http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/older-versions/
>
> The "why simple, when it can be done complicated?" commen
>|Is there a repository anywhere of at least all the Taupin releases?
http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/
http://icking-music-archive.org/software/musixtex/older-versions/
The "why simple, when it can be done complicated?" comment is
in T73, which is I think the oldest release (M
2018-05-21 18:48 GMT+02:00 Bob Tennent :
> >|I suspect the result is going to be that it can only
> >|be done with some devilishly complex, original TeX
> >|programming beyond my capabilities
> >|
> >|BTW, NONE of this would ever have come up if the octave
> >|treble clefs were handled in Mus
>|I suspect the result is going to be that it can only
>|be done with some devilishly complex, original TeX
>|programming beyond my capabilities
>|
>|BTW, NONE of this would ever have come up if the octave
>|treble clefs were handled in MusiXTeX the same as normal
>|clefs. Just sayin'.
This
On 2018-05-21 15:48, David Allsopp wrote:
The ideal would be for MusiXTeX to be capable of treating it in both
ways - as an alternate symbol *or* as an actual clef in its own
right. For example, in the singing example Dirk gives of a descant
sung by either Soprano or Tenor, the alternate symb
>|It seems 8 is "not used" as a clef symbol. Would that be
>|a way of making an additional "normal" clef?
I'm wrong, or rather, musixdoc is wrong: 8 is used to
indicate an "empty" clef.
Bob
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the
Bob Tennent wrote:
> >|> BTW, NONE of this would ever have come up if the octave >|treble
> clefs were handled in MusiXTeX the same as normal >|clefs. Just sayin'.
>
> I guess the use of single digits to reference clefs precluded adding
> additional "normal" clefs.
Yes and no - what it demonst
>|> BTW, NONE of this would ever have come up if the octave
>|treble clefs were handled in MusiXTeX the same as normal
>|clefs. Just sayin'.
I guess the use of single digits to reference clefs
precluded adding additional "normal" clefs.
>|
>|We've been there, and I agree with MusiXTeX that a
2018-05-21 0:52 GMT+02:00 Don Simons :
> Dirk Laurie wrote
>>
>> 2018-05-20 21:33 GMT+02:00 Don Simons :
>> > I’m working on PMX, trying to get it to handle (low) octave treble
>> > clefs predictably in all possible scenarios. One such situation would
>> > be where there is a single instrument with
Dirk Laurie wrote
>
> 2018-05-20 21:33 GMT+02:00 Don Simons :
> > I’m working on PMX, trying to get it to handle (low) octave treble
> > clefs predictably in all possible scenarios. One such situation would
> > be where there is a single instrument with multiple staves, once of
> > which has a nor
2018-05-20 21:33 GMT+02:00 Don Simons :
> I’m working on PMX, trying to get it to handle (low) octave treble clefs
> predictably in all possible scenarios. One such situation would be where
> there is a single instrument with multiple staves, once of which has a
> normal treble clef and another an
I'm working on PMX, trying to get it to handle (low) octave treble clefs
predictably in all possible scenarios. One such situation would be where
there is a single instrument with multiple staves, once of which has a
normal treble clef and another an octave treble clef. I cannot see how to
get Musi
13 matches
Mail list logo
