>|That said, IANAL, but curly.tex's redefinition of
>|\writ@staffs I think gives sufficient case it must be GPL
>|in order to comply with MusiXTeX's licence.
Possibly. I'd prefer explicit licensing by the author.
>|Out of curiosity, why can't they simply be renamed (e.g.
>|musixcurly and m
2015-02-03 10:10 GMT+02:00 David Allsopp :
> Out of curiosity, why can't they simply be renamed (e.g. musixcurly
> and musixtuplet, or something?) and given proper headers like other
> MusiXTeX modules?
MK's original posting had no filename. It consisted of lines of TeX code
embedded in the body
Bob Tennent wrote:
> Dear all: I propose to incorporate the definitions in these "extension
> libraries" into musixtex.tex. The reason is that Karl Berry, ever-vigilant
> for possible file-name clashes in TeXLive, feels the file names are too
> "generic" and I've only been allowed to put them into
2015-02-02 22:09 GMT+02:00 Dirk Laurie :
> 2015-02-02 21:53 GMT+02:00 Bob Tennent :
[content-free reply]
Sorry about that. Twitchy fingers.
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-m
2015-02-02 21:53 GMT+02:00 Bob Tennent :
> Dear all: I propose to incorporate the definitions in these
> "extension libraries" into musixtex.tex. The reason is that
> Karl Berry, ever-vigilant for possible file-name clashes in
> TeXLive, feels the file names are too "generic" and I've
> only been a
Dear all: I propose to incorporate the definitions in these
"extension libraries" into musixtex.tex. The reason is that
Karl Berry, ever-vigilant for possible file-name clashes in
TeXLive, feels the file names are too "generic" and I've
only been allowed to put them into the musixtex package in
the
6 matches
Mail list logo
