|On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Bob Tennent wrote:
|
| If you already have a musixtex score and don't want to start again using
| pmx, you can suppress instruments as follows: [...]
|
|Could you please provide an example with 3 or 4 instruments and 3 or 4
|measures?
The original source is in
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Bob Tennent wrote:
|Could you please provide an example with 3 or 4 instruments and 3 or 4
|measures?
The original source is in
http://icking-music-archive.org/scores/bach/bwv988/quod.zip
Sorry, quod.tex compiles nicely, but it provides the score and doesn't include
| |Could you please provide an example with 3 or 4 instruments and 3 or 4
| |measures?
|
| The original source is in
|
| http://icking-music-archive.org/scores/bach/bwv988/quod.zip
|
|Sorry, quod.tex compiles nicely, but it provides the score and doesn't
|include
|the \def\vnotes... of
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Bob Tennent wrote:
The example was in the rest of the message (after the _... ).
Sorry I thought the rest of the message was identical to quod.tex. Now I
obtain the Alto part. How can I switch to another part?
--
Jean-Pierre Coulon
|Now I
|obtain the Alto part. How can I switch to another part?
For example, to get the S part, change #4 to #5 on the right of the \def\vnotes
and adjust the \setname1 and \setclef1 accordingly.
Bob
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 06:46 -0400, Bob Tennent wrote:
|On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Bob Tennent wrote:
|
| If you already have a musixtex score and don't want to start again using
| pmx, you can suppress instruments as follows: [...]
|
|Could you please provide an example with 3 or 4
Bob Tennent wrote
Note that the other parts are indeed suppressed, but the note spacing
has to be corrected in the resulting part score. Also multiple-bar
rests.
ALL OF WHICH ARE DONE AUTOMATICALLY BY PMX!!! Plus, all info is stored in
one file and that's all you have to correct if you find a
|Neat; it works!
|
|But what would you change to print one of the other three parts instead?
|(Yes, I am treating this as a magic incantation of which I understand
|little, and yes, I do feel like the sorcer's apprentice.)
Answered in a previous post. But here's a brief explanation:
|
Sorry this crossed in the mail with Jean-Pierr Coulon asking the same
question and Bob Tennent answering it.
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:32 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
Neat; it works!
But what would you change to print one of the other three parts instead?
(Yes, I am treating this as a magic
:33 -0400
Von: Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com
An: tex-music@tug.org
Betreff: [Tex-music] musixps and extracting separate parts
Greetings,
I am using musixtex to set a piano trio written with overlapping
hairpins which start at different times. I read that musixps
|To print the score for each string instrument, I suppress the other
|instruments by assigning them zero staffs.
If you already have a musixtex score and don't want to start again using
pmx, you can suppress instruments as follows:
\instrumentnumber1
\startpiece
\makeatletter%
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 08:23 -0700, Don Simons wrote:
Terry--
As the developer of PMX, I'm always curious to know why anyone would prefer
using raw MusiXTeX. I can only speculate that it is either because you are
unaware of PMX, or because PMX lacks some feature that cannot be handled
within
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Bob Tennent wrote:
If you already have a musixtex score and don't want to start again using
pmx, you can suppress instruments as follows: [...]
Could you please provide an example with 3 or 4 instruments and 3 or 4
measures?
Regards,
--
Jean-Pierre Coulon
13 matches
Mail list logo
