Re: Letters for pitches (was RE: [TeX-music] Three voices in one note line with PMX - I can't get it ;-)

2005-05-19 Thread Christof Biebricher
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Don Simons wrote: > > thought you were taking into account the way TeX was going to change the > octave. As you can see, PMX is still confused about the default directions > of the stems; that's because it still thinks it's putting the notes much > lower. The moral of this sto

Re: Letters for pitches (was RE: [TeX-music] Three voices in one note line with PMX - I can't get it ;-)

2005-05-19 Thread Bernhard Lang
== 1 1 4 4 4 4 0 0 1 2 20 0 t .\ c44 D"Less dangerous" b a g | \zqu u\ c b a g / c44 D"Safe" b a g | \zqu{16}\ c b a g / == does the job ___ TeX-music mailing list TeX-music@icking-music-archive.org http://icking-music-ar

Letters for pitches (was RE: [TeX-music] Three voices in one note line with PMX - I can't get it ;-)

2005-05-19 Thread Don Simons
I'll let one of the others handle the basic questions here. I want to comment on > 3) What means N\ or M\ or L\ or \Mordent or \Shakenw or \n in the passage: As any experienced user knows, a construct like "\Mordent M\" is an in-line TeX command. The "\"'s are delimiters that show the start and s