Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:51:23AM -0700, William F Hammond wrote: > I think the source is nonsense -- or, at best, ambiguous -- if translation > to HTML with MathML is envisioned. For example, is this an abuse of math > because the user does not know about \textless or how to obtain U+2329? If >

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Michal Hoftich wrote: > > This sample document: > > - > \documentclass{article} > > \begin{document} > > hello $\langle$ > \end{document} > -- > > generates wrong mathml: > > > I think the source is no

[tex4ht] [bug #277] make timestamps in HTML output optional

Update of bug #277 (project tex4ht): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #5: thanks. i found several more uses of :today, and either configured them similarly (off by default,

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Michal Hoftich wrote: > This sample document: > > - > \documentclass{article} > > \begin{document} > > hello $\langle$ > \end{document} > -- > > generates wrong mathml: > I think the source is nonsense -- or, at best, ambiguous -- if translati

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #276] avoid multiple runs of latex

HGS> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:17:46 +0200 HGS> From: Hans Georg Schaathun HGS> I have actually seen people doing exactly that as part of a Makefile HGS> setup (using Bourne shell). Personally, I never copied that setup. HGS> It is a bit odd that I did not, since I do not doubt that it worked,

[tex4ht] [bug #275] titlesec package slows down tex4ht

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #275 (project tex4ht): I've spent yesterday by hunting the slowdown, I've rewrote lot of titlesec in custom .4ht file, but still haven't found the cause. There was lot of cases where token registers or \edef commands which were feeded with some new content in each section

[tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

URL: Summary: Wrong mathml with $\langle$ Project: tex4ht Submitted by: michal_h21 Submitted on: Thu 31 Mar 2016 02:34:24 PM EEST Category: None Priority: 5 - Normal

Re: [tex4ht] Crossreferences/Labels in OpenOffice conversion

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Hans Georg Schaathun wrote: > Thanks a lot Michal, > > Building on your suggestions, it seems that I had three proplems. > > 1. The class file probably accounted for the missing abstract. > That was just silly of me, I should have changed it for scrartcl. Or just

Re: [tex4ht] Crossreferences/Labels in OpenOffice conversion

Thanks a lot Michal, Building on your suggestions, it seems that I had three proplems. 1. The class file probably accounted for the missing abstract. That was just silly of me, I should have changed it for scrartcl. 2. The $\rangle$ and $\langle$ commands are not interpreted sensibly, but they d

Re: [tex4ht] Crossreferences/Labels in OpenOffice conversion

Hi Georg On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Hans Georg Schaathun wrote: > Hi, > > I have some experience using tex4ht to produce web pages. > Trying an OpenOffice conversion for the first time, I find > that labels/crossreferences do not work. > In fact, there are two errors. Citations (using b

[tex4ht] Crossreferences/Labels in OpenOffice conversion

Hi, I have some experience using tex4ht to produce web pages. Trying an OpenOffice conversion for the first time, I find that labels/crossreferences do not work. In fact, there are two errors. Citations (using bibtex) show empty brackets in the text. They are correct in the bibliography. Secon

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #276] avoid multiple runs of latex

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:04:14AM -0700, William F Hammond wrote: > I'm wondering whether, rather than deciding in advance how many latex runs > are needed, it would be sufficient simply for each latex run to search the > latex log file for > ' Rerun to get ' I have actually seen people doing exa