> I see. But I did not not write this latex. It seems to work OK in mathjax.
> This is how the latex came from a Mathematica newsletter which is emailed each
> week.
Yes I know. As I wrote: it sometimes work if you are lucky.
And people are lazy and so often try their luck and leave of the
Hi Nasser,
After changing the command and adding "mathml", now some
of my latex files no longer compile.
Please see this MWE
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
$n^\text{th}$
\end{document}
THe above used to compile OK using
make4ht filename.tex
On 8/21/2020 3:40 AM, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
After changing the command and adding "mathml", now some
of my latex files no longer compile.
Please see this MWE
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
$n^\text{th}$
\end{document}
$n^\text{th}$ is wrong, unsupported
> After changing the command and adding "mathml", now some
> of my latex files no longer compile.
> Please see this MWE
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{amsmath}
> \begin{document}
> $n^\text{th}$
> \end{document}
$n^\text{th}$ is wrong, unsupported syntax. It works (sometimes) but
On 8/19/2020 11:35 AM, Michal Hoftich wrote:
There is no change in regards to .htm files, you can still use
make4ht filename.tex "mathml,mathjax,htm"
to get .htm files. The change is just in the mathml.4ht file, it should
now render brackets correctly in most cases.
Best regards,
Michal
