[tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

Update of bug #278 (project tex4ht): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #2: The code from mathml- option for MathClass configurations is now used by default for the MathML out

[tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #278 (project tex4ht): The mathml- option doesn't insert extra elements, so it produces valid MathML code. Semantically, should be used to enclose the operator and the fenced code. The MathML code in this case is inserted using ht-fonts mechanism in tex4ht DVI processor

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

On 2 April 2016 at 00:37, Kaveh Bazargan wrote: > > On 2 April 2016 at 00:15, William F Hammond wrote: > >> Is there no way the old URLs can be restored? >> > > It's in the hands of one man living in his own little world! > > I have asked the TUG board to intervene but astonishingly they don't w

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

On 2 April 2016 at 00:15, William F Hammond wrote: > Is there no way the old URLs can be restored? > It's in the hands of one man living in his own little world! I have asked the TUG board to intervene but astonishingly they don't want to get "involved". Sigh... -- Kaveh Bazargan Director Ri

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

Kaveh writes: > On 1 April 2016 at 18:15, William F Hammond > wrote: > >> That /someone/ could be well-served by creating a suitable >> LaTeX profile for his or her writing. For more on my >> ideas about LaTeX profiles, see >> http://www.albany.edu/~hammond/presentations/Tug2010/ >> > > . . .

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

Hi William On 1 April 2016 at 18:15, William F Hammond wrote: > That /someone/ could be well-served by creating a suitable > LaTeX profile for his or her writing. For more on my > ideas about LaTeX profiles, see > http://www.albany.edu/~hammond/presentations/Tug2010/ > Thanks to Radhakrishnan

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

Hans Georg Schaathun writes: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:51:23AM -0700, William F Hammond wrote: >> I think the source is nonsense -- or, at best, ambiguous -- if translation >> to HTML with MathML is envisioned. For example, is this an abuse of math >> because the user does not know about \text

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

Michal -- You write: > It is based on earlier message from today, where OP used > it for encoding brackets around email address. It could be > seen (and I agree that it is) as abusing of math mode, but > this construct seems as quite common when I googled it. Yes, it is far too common. As I sai

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:51:23AM -0700, William F Hammond wrote: > I think the source is nonsense -- or, at best, ambiguous -- if translation > to HTML with MathML is envisioned. For example, is this an abuse of math > because the user does not know about \textless or how to obtain U+2329? If >

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Michal Hoftich wrote: > > This sample document: > > - > \documentclass{article} > > \begin{document} > > hello $\langle$ > \end{document} > -- > > generates wrong mathml: > > > I think the source is no

Re: [tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Michal Hoftich wrote: > This sample document: > > - > \documentclass{article} > > \begin{document} > > hello $\langle$ > \end{document} > -- > > generates wrong mathml: > I think the source is nonsense -- or, at best, ambiguous -- if translati

[tex4ht] [bug #278] Wrong mathml with $\langle$

URL: Summary: Wrong mathml with $\langle$ Project: tex4ht Submitted by: michal_h21 Submitted on: Thu 31 Mar 2016 02:34:24 PM EEST Category: None Priority: 5 - Normal