A lot of folks are missing the point. There are actually two problems at work
here. (Actually, just one: that people use e-mail without understanding how
it works...)
The first problem is the one Mark Minton succinctly covered. Every mail
client has the option of automaticall
ldn't no what you were missing and you would be at
> peace.
>
>
> ... I hope this was meaningful
>
> -B
>
>
>
> On 10/1/07, Ted Samsel wrote:
> >
> > Think "reply all"..
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > >From: Mixon B
ill
> >Sent: Oct 1, 2007 11:25 AM
> >To: Cavers Texas
> >Subject: [Texascavers] hitting reply
> >
> >I don't understand the business about hitting "reply" accidentally
> >sending to the Texas Cavers list.
>
> http://home.infionline.net/~tbsa
Think "reply all"..
-Original Message-
>From: Mixon Bill
>Sent: Oct 1, 2007 11:25 AM
>To: Cavers Texas
>Subject: [Texascavers] hitting reply
>
>I don't understand the business about hitting "reply" accidentally
>sending to the Texas Caver
I don't understand the business about hitting "reply" accidentally
sending to the Texas Cavers list. On both my Mac and PC systems
(Apple Mail and Outlook Express), hitting "reply" creates a message
to the originator of the post, not to the list. If some people are
_accidentally_ sending re
