RE: [Texascavers] Is this noteworthy ?

2010-05-18 Thread Sheryl Rieck
I think so! Sheryl -Original Message- From: David [mailto:dlocklea...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 10:45 AM To: Cavers Texas Subject: [Texascavers] Is this noteworthy ? http://www.foxnews.com/images/605410/0_61_320_oldest_sex_to

Re: [Texascavers] Is this noteworthy ?

2010-05-18 Thread Gill Edigar
Better we call it a 'multi-purpose tool' than a sex toy. --Ediger On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:45 AM, David wrote: > http://www.foxnews.com/images/605410/0_61_320_oldest_sex_toy.jpg > > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,593072,00.html > >

Re: [Texascavers] Is this noteworthy ?

2010-05-18 Thread Brian Riordan
Was it used literally to start fires, or is that a metaphorical meaning? Also, was this the original look of the tool, or did some teenager alter the fire starter as a joke. I see these types of "jokes" in public restrooms all the time... On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Gill Edigar wrote: >

Re: [Texascavers] Is this noteworthy ?

2010-05-18 Thread Rod Goke
hardly ;) -Original Message- >From: David >Sent: May 18, 2010 10:45 AM >To: Cavers Texas >Subject: [Texascavers] Is this noteworthy ? > >http://www.foxnews.com/images/605410/0_61_320_oldest_sex_toy.jpg > > >http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,593072,00.html > >David Locklear > >